IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Wed, 09 October 2024 06:46 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90C3C15153F; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Nderynclsiv; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D290C151095; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XNk1W3t9jz6K9B5; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:46:07 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml100005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.160.25]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90235140133; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:46:24 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemf500005.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.243) by lhrpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:46:23 +0100
Received: from kwepemf100007.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.221) by kwepemf500005.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:46:21 +0800
Received: from kwepemf100007.china.huawei.com ([7.202.181.221]) by kwepemf100007.china.huawei.com ([7.202.181.221]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:46:21 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy
Thread-Index: AdsUCH2u/fcejgBNTzioCtsPGij2jv//5u+A//P37fCAF5NyAP//VY/A
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 06:46:21 +0000
Message-ID: <596ad8f7da1441f7bcce16d5947a5165@huawei.com>
References: <BEZP281MB20085D267CFABD1474A4771898772@BEZP281MB2008.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CA+RyBmV+mErkBGqn=APs_Reuz+aG1=00H0ZehMbCdgj-RUAgMw@mail.gmail.com> <3215d88e87ec4f25b5edad2f138e63b1@huawei.com> <CA+RyBmW595kqod_qx83sM2Bb8E8q+q_L66-ySCC4tjkkO8i7=g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmW595kqod_qx83sM2Bb8E8q+q_L66-ySCC4tjkkO8i7=g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.118]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_596ad8f7da1441f7bcce16d5947a5165huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: N6VXZI4DRAZV3RSMZQWVLAC355LGXVCB
X-Message-ID-Hash: N6VXZI4DRAZV3RSMZQWVLAC355LGXVCB
X-MailFrom: zhoutianran@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "n.leymann@telekom.de" <N.Leymann@telekom.de>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, MPLS Working Group <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org" <draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/sjecRZtXJfH9ybEDxp4D99JnLCU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Copy to this thread.
If MNA need a new entropy mechanism, there is a great compatible issue with existing MPLS deployment.

Best,
Tianran

From: Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 12:36 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>
Cc: n.leymann@telekom.de; mpls <mpls@ietf.org>; MPLS Working Group <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy

Hi Jie,
I responded to your note on the thread you've mentioned. It seems like you are mixing the discussion with your company's product management with the discussion of the optional extension of the MPLS data plane by MPLS WG.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Oct 8, 2024, 21:14 Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com<mailto:jie.dong@huawei.com>> wrote:
Just realized that I should also reply to this thread…

As being discussed in another thread about MPLS entropy, there are already several mechanisms for providing entropy in MPLS, and they have been deployed in production networks.

Without explicit requirements from operators, it seems providing yet another option for MPLS entropy is not beneficial.

Thus I do not support the adoption of this draft.

-Jie

From: Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com<mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2024 4:18 AM
To: N.Leymann@telekom.de<mailto:N.Leymann@telekom.de>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>; mpls-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org<mailto:draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy

The draft offers a practical use of MNA. The drafts is well-written and is very clear on the proposed mechanism. I support the adoption of the draft by the MPLS WG.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 7:05 AM <N.Leymann@telekom.de<mailto:N.Leymann@telekom.de>> wrote:
Dear WG,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy as a MPLS working group document.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the MPLS working group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>).
Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document
should not be adopted as a working group document.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosure against this document. All the authors/contributors have stated on
the MPLS WG mailing list that they are unaware of any undisclosed IPRs that relates to this document.

This working group adoption poll ends October 16, 2024.

Regards,

Nic (as MPLS WG co-chair)
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list -- mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to mpls-leave@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status