[mpls] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases

[[e-mail]]

Hi Greg,

Thank you for the prompt reply.
Please see inline.

Original


From: GregMirsky <[e-mail]>
To: 肖敏10093570;
Cc: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
Date: 2024年06月12日 23:45
Subject: Re: [mpls] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases





Hi Xiao Min,thank you for your support of this work; much appreciated. Please find my notes below tagged GIM>>.

Regards,
Greg




On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:53 PM <[e-mail]> wrote:


I support progressing this draft to publication.

Two small comments as below for the authors to consider.
One is on Section 2.2.1 In-situ OAM, IOAM Trace Options include only Pre-allocated Trace and Incremental Trace, and other types of IOAM Option are not IOAM Trace Options.


GIM>> You are correct. These are all IOAM Option Types. I propose the following editorial update:
OLD TEXT:
   Several IOAM Trace Options have been defined:
   *  Pre-allocated and Incremental
   *  Edge-to-Edge
   *  Proof-of-Transit
   *  Direct Export (DEX)
 NEW TEXT:
   Several IOAM Option-Types have been defined:
   *  Pre-allocated Trace and Incremental Trace
   *  Edge-to-Edge
   *  Proof-of-Transit
   *  Direct Export (DEX)

Would that update address your concern?
[XM]>>> This update looks good to me. And one more update might be needed, s/In all IOAM Trace Options except for the Direct Export/In all IOAM Option-Types except for the Direct Export.



Another one is on Section 2.2.2 Alternate Marking Method, I would be happy if a reference to draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation can be added.


GIM>> In the course of the discussions, it appears to me that the group agreed to concentrate on the method that can be realized using MNA, not on an example of implementation in the MPLS network. WDYT? 
[XM]>>> I can live with it without that reference. :-)

Cheers,
Xiao Min



Best Regards,
Xiao Min

Original

From: TonyLi <[e-mail]>
To: mpls <[e-mail]>;
Cc: mpls-chairs <[e-mail]>;
Date: 2024年06月05日 06:26
Subject: [mpls] WGLC on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list -- [e-mail]
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]

[WG chair hat: on]


Hi folks,
This starts a 2 week working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases/)

This WGLC will expire at 4pm PDT, Jun 18, 2024.

Please comment as to the readiness of this document for publication, both pro and con.

There are no IPR filings against this document.

Regards,
Tony








_______________________________________________
 mpls mailing list -- [e-mail]
 To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]