Re: [mpls] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-08: (with COMMENT)

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Wed, 26 February 2020 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B7A3A0F87; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:27:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=QdMg8u5l; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=DH3ooy6K
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N8fByZ8QmB8a; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:27:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ABDD3A0F85; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:27:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=18491; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1582741621; x=1583951221; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=YZxC9iwUug4lZ9R2zSmBG751G+IM9rNanFoXngCIsBg=; b=QdMg8u5l37cC/UpF5pYi9sGh9/lEy86G/gEoiVL+EFnKpfvUm0wtH2UN Rk4/LeG5sY+AtPrBDyq/AykArCXd4MgjoCKi/xLmPzvz4dUXWkYNg+Mgj Ev00utyCg96MUvXosy49PzJ4zbiriUZZaV9shq1EUa82lGkOBzq0Kx8IJ Y=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A1RNL8Rx9GlhrkXjXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9p?= =?us-ascii?q?sgjfdUf7+++4j5YhSN/u1j2VnOW4iTq+lJjebbqejBYSQB+t7A1RJKa5lQT1?= =?us-ascii?q?kAgMQSkRYnBZuIF1z9J/3nRyc7B89FElRi+iLzPA=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BuCgBat1Ze/4oNJK1mHAEBAQEBBwE?= =?us-ascii?q?BEQEEBAEBgXuBJS9QBWxYIAQLKgqECoNGA4pjgjolkzKEYoJSA1QJAQEBDAE?= =?us-ascii?q?BJQgCBAEBhEACF4FqJDgTAgMNAQEFAQEBAgEFBG2FNwyFYwEBAQEDEhEdAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?pDgEPAgEIDgMDAQIrAgICMBoDCAIEAQ0FIoMEAYF9TQMuAQMLpDUCgTmIYnW?= =?us-ascii?q?BMoJ/AQEFgUNBgwoYggwDBoE4jCUagUE/gREnDBSCTD6CZAEBAgEBggENgmQ?= =?us-ascii?q?ygiyNXoMHhXCZRQqCPIdRjxQcgkmIG5BKg0yLJIh8kksCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWk?= =?us-ascii?q?igVhwFWUBgkFQGA2OHTiDO4UUhUF0AgGBJo8lAYEPAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,489,1574121600"; d="scan'208,217";a="731466702"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 26 Feb 2020 18:27:00 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 01QIR02J001258 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 18:27:00 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:27:00 -0600
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:26:59 -0600
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:26:59 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=QcrBzNzbOqLPuwcrxyNVnifzdxP8ERu/5ptNXokBYysPhnzue1BAqAqcYutQuC5NzR0XOhztNd8iLDrWVDJQlZyeiMAtK/l73MWUHwEAWF4mEwbJl0zOuYKdt2QRGwIZ1RgRUtWthjsFcN84O3YX7ejbPuyJsQz4S7hy0N6IT//bVTlLeUlGZXD4zXUDAd2oAMwD9lQ11X8u7Vtxxc8KnPtQoWTt+xoc3ASVguBiaIbpBB9qTeNZzYgx45J2APG+KBqjSZGChn5O79ShBdNBv10t+b0V+1DtlJjv4yJ4w2L64fnGzEiMfoB/jIrADtiJIgmwlrD4VyEvpqmiGYGu3A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=YZxC9iwUug4lZ9R2zSmBG751G+IM9rNanFoXngCIsBg=; b=hyrqIz69L/gWdxmcNz7en/PJZ99QLbELyAYLxQF6hnQz291qtOc1KZcv7OjzgqJ7oZvydDT9HFo4/IS7VV7ajnHJi4O8aQ+Rq2C5x61MhSY7Eoz6DeZ+Hk8MAmK7dIIJ+61zcd9BH/r7jF240lf08Ii2Y0Yv3BXOosR+mHhT8ByhobYLBeSdAIaLSrXfXahTCBvg69YwlZsmOhQxzPGmNajRGBGe9ul5FECOfEcSXem0XfS4SqLIsWdCkl2oaKxw6g5KJ0PL+RVv4KDMW/HVjTdnmeZp1Rr/fm6BvOcgO5B6HPpTiLpZIjai0KYCn3LQ1vr7zMAV3kcYLmkvw9YC8w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=YZxC9iwUug4lZ9R2zSmBG751G+IM9rNanFoXngCIsBg=; b=DH3ooy6KK8K/ZPce+wXrJG2Ulzxw0bF//PkOYpuspX5/vZQvxGZYvG4KxD02SpqOBQCZMY/AeRad0buhiyoQNWlCqcuLkiA6I0mn8UTNMV+wu3OwDY/DNV/ZvxBYRTymeQn/R//hQ9/ucU6YPSwEY77szL9iKiysMqANDiBwYOM=
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:10d::13) by DM5PR11MB1356.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:14::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.14; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 18:26:58 +0000
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::680d:e22e:72d5:67ca]) by DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::680d:e22e:72d5:67ca%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2772.012; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 18:26:58 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad@juniper.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, Nicolai Leymann <n.leymann@telekom.de>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: =?utf-8?B?w4lyaWMgVnluY2tlJ3MgTm8gT2JqZWN0aW9uIG9uIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtbXBs?= =?utf-8?Q?s-summary-frr-rsvpte-08:_(with_COMMENT)?=
Thread-Index: AQHV6DayrZNxE1kUMUifOaO8Y2xLm6gtfzyAgABlwAA=
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 18:26:58 +0000
Message-ID: <396619AA-6E52-4281-807F-0801220D529E@cisco.com>
References: <2E011926-44E3-4FE7-A283-16F75308977B@juniper.net> <293D40AD-A378-4E70-B61E-F73413AA6A01@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <293D40AD-A378-4E70-B61E-F73413AA6A01@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.22.0.200209
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=evyncke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [92.184.98.175]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fcc9c244-6b00-43a6-7a60-08d7bae97742
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB1356:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR11MB13569B8E675F247A80A3A668A9EA0@DM5PR11MB1356.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0325F6C77B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(346002)(199004)(189003)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(66446008)(478600001)(71200400001)(66946007)(26005)(6486002)(4326008)(36756003)(6512007)(91956017)(76116006)(186003)(316002)(81166006)(8936002)(54906003)(81156014)(33656002)(110136005)(86362001)(224303003)(2906002)(5660300002)(6506007)(2616005)(53546011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR11MB1356; H:DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: LcdPpFTytEAjdRuJ/y4O/jcR2290qa+0PSeYj0Dt9SRuiWtJt8PjNUFFDSuHFu+Xbf81x1SSh+6f2xshMHip3MgwWwQYBEJZVV4x838Ztu2WBhXLB67IfV+hNLzBvwNAhtSo+M7bANmpsF21FyVNzA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_396619AA6E524281807F0801220D529Eciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fcc9c244-6b00-43a6-7a60-08d7bae97742
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Feb 2020 18:26:58.6486 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: wlFLpLNJK8rAFxq49njRH7sJJI9i+VgPE1RTwTD2rSm5/Hqzo719TxIIxWHMaD0LRoscj9ptI94Gm2ejaSG6qQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB1356
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.14, xch-rcd-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/t6te6Ph02p22Dvy_GN_nwvwdQxY>
Subject: Re: [mpls] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf?= =?utf-8?q?-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-08=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 18:27:04 -0000

Thank you Tarek

-éric

From: Tarek Saad <tsaad@juniper.net>
Date: Wednesday, 26 February 2020 at 19:23
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>rg>, Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte@ietf.org>rg>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>rg>, Nicolai Leymann <n.leymann@telekom.de>de>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-08: (with COMMENT)

Thank you Eric for reviewing the document and for providing comments. We have uploaded version -09 that addresses them.

Please see inline for responses.

>>>>>>
Thank you for the work put into this document. Please find below a couple of non-blocking COMMENTs (even if non blocking, I would appreciate it if authors sent a response).

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

== COMMENTS ==

-- Section 3.1.1 and other places --

Is there any reason why the "Reserved field" does not specify "to be set to 0 when sending and ignored on received" ?
[TS]: Agreed, was addressed in latest version.


-- Section 3.1 --

The flow is a little strange IMHO, there is text at the end of 3.1.2 that probably applies to the whole section 3.1. If this is the case, then may I suggest to have a subsection 3.1.3 ?

[TS]: thanks for the suggestion. We have created a new section 3.1.3 for the section as suggested.

3.1.3<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-09#section-3.1.3>.3>.  Processing Rules for B-SFRR-Ready Extended ASSOCIATION Object


-- Section 4 --

Is the number "11bbbbbb" be understood as a binary number ?


Is "ignoring and passing" the object enough for backward compatibility? I am not an MPLS TE expert at all... but I find this section a little light: I assume that this object must be understand by the remote side of the "FRR tunnel".

[TS]: Yes, the number "11bbbbbb" is in bits– where b represents a bit that takes 0 or 1 value. This is customary for new RSVP class-nums that are unknown to some RSVP node(s) and that need to be ignored and passed unchanged - RFC2205 details this behavior in section 3.10. We have clarified this and added a reference.


Regards,
Tarek