IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-sfc

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 17 October 2018 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8B5130DEA; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 08:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.29
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL=1.31] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7WpagXQS8uv6; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 08:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAC24129AB8; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 08:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w9HFtwjQ026333; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:55:58 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A517B2203B; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:55:58 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ECC32203C; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:55:58 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 950129200 (4.43.114.87.dyn.plus.net [87.114.43.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w9HFtucY017234 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:55:58 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Loa Andersson' <loa@pi.nu>, mpls@ietf.org
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-sfc@ietf.org, 'Deborah A Brungard' <db3546@att.com>
References: <92cc2a83-1571-06c4-e9aa-af4a869cad67@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <92cc2a83-1571-06c4-e9aa-af4a869cad67@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:55:58 +0100
Message-ID: <073101d46631$e605d6c0$b2118440$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQI+6M77epT5J5rmeXJIQ57DpvdCh6ROjrkA
X-Originating-IP: 87.114.43.4
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24162.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--12.885-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--12.885-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24162.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--12.885200-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: scwq2vQP8OHxIbpQ8BhdbKJVTu7sjgg1bv16+gil4jeObf10apLcSYP+ YDa/Dhu9F16bSyysW+9DL+swkbtLArGmCpeiKrRB+yCukNfq/Z5Aq6/y5AEOOsZYySG4WQQhL6v IGUOjhDvDgGiSi1hwZzaa3EyGqiXD350iwCDSh6bzh2yKdnl7WAuK1hIitSIHpcn28zKwP8I5dQ Ur4gk2wsKSxWoRVwxksGRzEHTW2nFNfs8n85Te8oMbH85DUZXy2n9TdfAvmQKw7M6dyuYKg46HM 5rqDwqtVpEcNuyBa1oYXElF9SD3cpZDH3ufC5qN4Zk/CcyCLyxmiZAb/3mmlA==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/t8glXBhlKvVgXDYVRbcpBHG-1wc>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-sfc
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:56:06 -0000

Hi Loa,

I'm unaware of any IPR that applies to this document.

Thanks,
Adrian

> We are currently preparing draft draft-ietf-mpls-sfc for working
> group last call.
> 
> Part of this preparation is to do an IPR poll.
> 
> This mail is to start the IPR poll.
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-sfc?
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
> There are no IPR disclosures directly against
> draft-ietf-mpls-egress-protection-framework.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email