Re: [mpls] FW: wg last call and IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-07
Rajiv Papneja <rajiv.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 19 June 2012 02:47 UTC
Return-Path: <rajiv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFD211E80BB for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VcMFy+UBMMGq for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gg0-f172.google.com (mail-gg0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCEB11E8080 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggnc4 with SMTP id c4so4708031ggn.31 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=huvQVQ80yQZXb9RCHZXGbT5QknfOHCi94erjI5fXchY=; b=XcG5lekJdVC8zGgc12v1jH9BxVr77FzHf8Uu0TxpWuGlJbhESleHymCBZtv5IGFAMi cwj9Li5YOA6RUtR4t8WLnQrZub3hHTUxzQ0Hkd0E82fc7yz47jSaOJZR3FY/FDeu5aQy ConRS0hAGLMOfNylvZ70QBzlyrefCNy0cEdbjHwow1J9W6j6IL257BALP2weqUBfvsE4 GhK5xEzRlhPbzzPkYsKR5A8K0XJ8dLX/D9AKxxD4OyBnw+O/Yx4XYlokIFOzvAtDFcwi KuxS+yioE0yzBYVeFt1Bnod+ObE/C7rJ8xxh75XGjHH6ZlRyyMOOWwWQzyAjMhFYKJTE qlAg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.76.137 with SMTP id k9mr10241210igw.25.1340074020178; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.39.237 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <52B0D42F4BADB144B850705C4549F6EA017F6C65@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <52B0D42F4BADB144B850705C4549F6EA017F6C65@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:47:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CABPUNsSfb0cx1Dupj6qKfebWw48vHkqzL0e1tJ7=YPYn8_Ky5w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rajiv Papneja <rajiv.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, mpls@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f23433bf20b9704c2ca4bf6"
Subject: Re: [mpls] FW: wg last call and IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-07
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 02:47:02 -0000
Loa, I am not aware of any IPR related to this I-D. Thanks, - Rajiv > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Loa Andersson > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 2:21 AM > To: mpls@ietf.org > Cc: mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; > draft-ietf-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv@tools.ietf.org > Subject: [mpls] wg last call and IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-07 > > Working Group, > > this is to start a one week working group last call on > draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-07. > > Bckground - the draft was passed working group last call in August > last year, and it should from that perspective be OK to request > publication. > > However; > > - it is a bit too long ago > - after the wg last call a discussion, that did not really cause any > changes to the draft, that generated great interest. > The background was that for the 32-bit LSR-id an routeable IPv4 > address has often been used in IPv4 networks. Thre were interest of > using an routeabel IPv6 address for LSR-id in IPv6 networks. > It was decided not to go down this path, since it would have huge > impact on the LDP protocol itself and all the HW implementations. > > This working group last call is limited to the changes between version > -06 and -07. > > Also since this draft was through wg last call before we explicitly > started to poll for IPRs on our draft, we need to do that now. > > Listed authors need to make an explicit statement to the working group > and working group chairs that all the IPRs they now of has been > disclosed or that they are not aware of any IPRs > > Other working group members that har aware of IPRs should state so on > the working group mailing list. > > This working group last call and IPR poll ends June 18th, 2012. > > /Loa > for the mpls wg co-chairs > > > -- > > > Loa Andersson email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com > Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa@pi.nu > Ericsson Inc phone: +46 10 717 52 13 > +46 767 72 92 13 > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >
- [mpls] wg last call and IPR poll on draft-ietf-mp… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] wg last call and IPR poll on draft-iet… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] wg last call and IPR poll on draft-iet… Vishwas Manral
- Re: [mpls] wg last call and IPR poll on draft-iet… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] wg last call and IPR poll on draft-iet… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] wg last call and IPR poll on draft-iet… Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
- Re: [mpls] wg last call and IPR poll on draft-iet… Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [mpls] FW: wg last call and IPR poll on draft… Rajiv Papneja
- Re: [mpls] wg last call and IPR poll on draft-iet… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] wg last call and IPR poll on draft-iet… Rajiv Asati (rajiva)