Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document

Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Mon, 07 March 2016 09:26 UTC

Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355AA1B3821; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 01:26:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xgm4V4lIgZkk; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 01:26:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38A9D1B3D26; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 01:26:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id l68so62578748wml.1; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 01:26:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aNVD80qV1Nt0O26HjT7WZ2pq89kX83+ebsT0B60OItc=; b=jkjeOqPwe/5mPkKq5bmaXrMxBaWGT9CRe4tXn4izSCUcpZbW2B/j+UstOoFm6EVHZS pl+lKS2s4MaHvb91xsJR0+5qQzV8x4FoC8JYRg1yw1o8ySwP0JSFQOqN30Et1yvnYJZg FxczacBAlGCCgs4UFnGIZYHSiklJ1ODxP4kCLBr090E0C5X8eSVnWna3rLR5Kgh/yW+5 WOhwD0TAXTtUbpSYg5nPKp67BW8riExccfwqaowppFcb94Lqemp1AdJApemfN0skm2dM oACXjq5UwgiMAALC1wKqlPwwO5awaci2bVbv27moWqTqZJjXY5xVtezYW5wmH42hwXp7 mHaQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from :reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aNVD80qV1Nt0O26HjT7WZ2pq89kX83+ebsT0B60OItc=; b=f8ZltTNNT/8P82/ymNaRaIOmOGBSWfbFitVR/BR8HVpQSDhHgumVgUKgCdePFEM+0z djHaIXCBo6JNaRHp56RWfS0XlGFQ6DWqDRjI4QQ4ff6w1SLBPrRIb/rh520uonZsw9Wn dk0L7LFwZzD9sojC+LCSjS5iXfk9FNSKLdWjDk1Mb2HJevW4EwqG5AurM1UcAwxOBRqA z8DtqTWAiJr3Eqzo32HTVTNH4mIhdShFlL4XkjpDf47hOoKlgkbBu46JYLDSJPF+ZmLw FwIGAWdDJ/Jv9X1YOTZqvBohBznHuQQ5aybic5HV9jL1lmMsi1fVg3oV5CK8vD/aMZvP xCig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIJVtNzeyxBUAo6xcERbKgYdh0UQoXLrlPciE1hNQkhJFoKOwH/lZNiM0nvsWcjyg==
X-Received: by 10.28.52.197 with SMTP id b188mr12570152wma.77.1457342797765; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 01:26:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from McAsterix.local ([92.109.37.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 192sm12781937wmw.0.2016.03.07.01.26.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Mar 2016 01:26:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <56DD4957.2000508@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 10:26:47 +0100
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/tut9PW0OgaGyXeGObOzaP4hbSus>
Cc: "draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org" <draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 09:26:41 -0000

All,

Yes, I support adoption of this draft to become WG draft.

Cheers, Huub.

------------

On 05-03-16 09:39, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-
> updates as an MPLS working group document.
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
> There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>
> All the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they
> are not aware of any IPRs that relate to this document.
>
> Note: One of the issues that surfaced in the MPLS-RT review was that the
> implementation status was unclear. To check on this we did an early
> implementation poll. There have been responses to the mailing, to the
> mpls wg chairs and to my uni-directionally. The conclusion is that
> RFC 7271 (the specification that this document updates) is well
> implemented and we know of deployments; a rather large number of
> vendors says that they will implement this draft and operators has
> stated that it will be deployed once it is available.
>
> The working group adoption poll ends March 19, 2016.
>
> /Loa
>
> MPLS wg co-chair.


-- 
*****************************************************************
               请记住,你是独一无二的,就像其他每一个人一样