IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-07

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Mon, 17 July 2017 09:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CAB12EA95; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UiPwhgnT3_8A; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48397126E3A; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 89B3C1E377; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 05:23:32 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 05:23:32 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@cisco.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed.all@ietf.org, bfd-chairs@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170717092332.GD24942@pfrc.org>
References: <149978159930.12344.18347332855391607627@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+RyBmUrraRZeO3mwmurfaVwZva22J=3YNOTSN77utjhZc5Osw@mail.gmail.com> <20170717090400.GC24942@pfrc.org> <CA+RyBmXZmb0tXx2Up=uyDAv2-i2sbPzHfSQ4K-ov6+K6WQy4og@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmXZmb0tXx2Up=uyDAv2-i2sbPzHfSQ4K-ov6+K6WQy4og@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/uTLdCaYh7lK2j6wqoWdpAWl0pcE>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-07
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:13:59 -0000

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:06:01AM -0700, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> true, the RFC 5884 does not discuss handling of subsequent LSP Ping with
> the same BFD Discriminator value in BFD Discriminator TLV. My reference to
> RFC 5884 is to point that the default, implied path for the reverse
> direction of the BFD session is over IP network and that how this draft
> interprets BFD Reverse Path TLV with none- sub-TLVs included. And yes,
> nodes that would support this draft MUST handle subsequent LSP Ping Echo
> Request with BFD Discriminator and BFD Reverse TLVs.
> 

I don't believe the procedure updating 5884 to change existing session
properties is called out in the -directed document.  I don't have a strong
opinion about the use case of whether such updates are desired or not.
That's a decision for the MPLS WG.  However, I do think such procedure needs
to be clear if it's desired.  This is part of Carlos' point.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email