Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to make draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates a working group document

"Kyung-Yeop Hong (hongk)" <hongk@cisco.com> Fri, 04 October 2013 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <hongk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28C821F9DAF for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 08:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jPfMi5C2Hlbv for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 08:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3943121F9D9A for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 08:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1660; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1380899506; x=1382109106; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=rg/8Oc1e82uDVeTakbSwqlmczk9kDyN/ut0jw/RSBXw=; b=m+sJZQGlk4i/ril5eoL5k75MRibbV82i+e+ljJotnK47sA7OA3szvbOC ryA6GOZsc06AerLQCoVS3ftWOyQ/XW0eTcEN+ShpqJPHVreCTtWEWkC++ fI+oF/p6iNALAO1XdmEEQ6AB71wUfl7S60EfOh11cWqFuTzqx/e7puDUJ Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AigFAHbZTlKtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4UsA1gRGBGhZ0giUBAQEEAQEBNzEDCwwCAgIBCBEEAQELFAUEBxsMCxQJCAIEAQ0FCId+DLt5BASOBIEYMQcGgxmBBAOqAIFmgT6BcTk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1033,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="268152122"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Oct 2013 15:11:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r94FBjaK028226 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 4 Oct 2013 15:11:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.8.232]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 10:11:45 -0500
From: "Kyung-Yeop Hong (hongk)" <hongk@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to make draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates a working group document
Thread-Index: AQHOwQCdRA2nK2Q2gUK1Qi5V2abv05nkpapw
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:11:44 +0000
Message-ID: <7AF4A59FF2EC434CB4C6CC6C1F182FBE159F676D@xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com>
References: <524EB743.6040107@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <524EB743.6040107@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.249.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates@tools.ietf.org" <draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to make draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates a working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:14:51 -0000

Support.

KY

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 8:41 AM
To: mpls@ietf.org
Cc: mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to make draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates a working group document

Working Group,

This is to start a two week poll on to see if we have consensus to adopt
draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates-03 as an MPLS working group document.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group mailing list (mpls at ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not be adopted as a working group document.

Please note that this document only updates RFC6378 and that we chosen this path rather than do a RFC6378bis.

This poll ends October 18, 2013.

There are no IPR claims disclosed against this document.

The author has stated on the working group mailing list that he is not aware of any IPRs related to this draft.
However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and aware of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose this is now.

/Loa
(mpls wg co-chair)
-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls