Return-Path: X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485D121F8D2B for ; Fri, 31 May 2013 07:49:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.334, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_RAND_6=2, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vOEs2l4jYbH2 for ; Fri, 31 May 2013 07:48:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og127.obsmtp.com (exprod7og127.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6125F21F8D31 for ; Fri, 31 May 2013 07:48:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob127.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUai4W8mNuMW+7JFaO6MyMhhYW/YSZ6Hu@postini.com; Fri, 31 May 2013 07:48:59 PDT Received: from P-CLDFE02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.60) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Fri, 31 May 2013 07:47:32 -0700 Received: from o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.149) by o365mail.juniper.net (172.24.192.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.355.2; Fri, 31 May 2013 07:47:32 -0700 Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (216.32.180.12) by o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Fri, 31 May 2013 07:50:50 -0700 Received: from mail16-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.239) by VA3EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (10.7.40.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 31 May 2013 14:47:31 +0000 Received: from mail16-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail16-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEE93A016F for ; Fri, 31 May 2013 14:47:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.244.213; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:CH1PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT X-SpamScore: -22 X-BigFish: PS-22(zz9371Ic85fh4015Izz1f42h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1033IL17326ah18c673h1c8fb4h8275bh8275dhz31h2a8h668h839hd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1bceh1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail16-va3: transitioning domain of juniper.net does not designate 157.56.244.213 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.244.213; envelope-from=rcallon@juniper.net; helo=CH1PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; Received: from mail16-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail16-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1370011648825559_10728; Fri, 31 May 2013 14:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3EHSMHS021.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.252]) by mail16-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D92220073; Fri, 31 May 2013 14:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.244.213) by VA3EHSMHS021.bigfish.com (10.7.99.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 31 May 2013 14:47:27 +0000 Received: from CH1PRD0510MB355.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.2.41]) by CH1PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.150.37]) with mapi id 14.16.0311.000; Fri, 31 May 2013 14:47:27 +0000 From: Ross Callon To: "mpls@ietf.org" , "draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll for WG adoption for draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry-02 Thread-Index: Ac5KBNrRqy5GgTuxR1iRJSatXBuqdwUB+BlQ Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 14:47:27 +0000 Message-ID: <62CCD4C52ACDAD4481149BD5D8A72FD316C8FE8B@CH1PRD0510MB355.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: <62CCD4C52ACDAD4481149BD5D8A72FD316C3ED09@CH1PRD0510MB355.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <62CCD4C52ACDAD4481149BD5D8A72FD316C3ED09@CH1PRD0510MB355.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [66.129.232.2] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_62CCD4C52ACDAD4481149BD5D8A72FD316C8FE8BCH1PRD0510MB355_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%TOOLS.IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net Cc: "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll for WG adoption for draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry-02 X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 14:49:06 -0000 --_000_62CCD4C52ACDAD4481149BD5D8A72FD316C8FE8BCH1PRD0510MB355_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This poll has ended. We do not currently have consensus on the way forward, and thus draft-pac-m= pls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry-02 is not accepted as a WG draft at= the current time. However, it is clear that a solution, or at least some c= larification, is needed to address the issue that motivated draft-pac-mpls-= lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry. As such authors of draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry are w= orking offline with authors of RFC 4379 to come up with a solution. We can = expect to have further discussion on the MPLS email list and possibly in Be= rlin. Thanks, Ross From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ros= s Callon Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2013 10:53 PM To: mpls@ietf.org; draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry@tools= .ietf.org Cc: mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org Subject: [mpls] Poll for WG adoption for draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-s= ub-tlvs-registry-02 Working group, this is to start a "two week" poll on adopting draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry-02 as an MPLS working group document. Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). This poll will end May 20th, 2013. Ross (as mpls wg co-chair) --_000_62CCD4C52ACDAD4481149BD5D8A72FD316C8FE8BCH1PRD0510MB355_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This poll has ended.

 <= /p>

We do not currently have = consensus on the way forward, and thus draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub= -tlvs-registry-02 is not accepted as a WG draft at the current time. However, it is clear that a solution, or at least some clarification= , is needed to address the issue that motivated draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlv= s-and-sub-tlvs-registry.

 <= /p>

As such authors of draft-= pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry are working offline with autho= rs of RFC 4379 to come up with a solution. We can expect to have further discussion on the MPLS email list and possibly in Berlin. =

 <= /p>

Thanks, Ross

 <= /p>

From: mpls-bou= nces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ross Callon
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2013 10:53 PM
To: mpls@ietf.org; draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registr= y@tools.ietf.org
Cc: mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Poll for WG adoption for draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlv= s-and-sub-tlvs-registry-02

 

Working group,

 

this is to start a "two week" poll on adopting

draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry-02

as an MPLS working group document.

 

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working<= /o:p>

group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org).<= o:p>

 

This poll will end May 20th, 2013.

 

Ross

(as mpls wg co-chair)

 

 

--_000_62CCD4C52ACDAD4481149BD5D8A72FD316C8FE8BCH1PRD0510MB355_--