IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: [RTG-DIR]Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-07

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Thu, 04 July 2024 23:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04ACC1840FE; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 16:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vsVZF1O7b70x; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 16:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA2EBC14F70F; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 16:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c97aceb6e4so701440a91.2; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 16:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720135874; x=1720740674; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yV31MLVU18h28LglrXbc9JoAwLdGpc1PrAHCw/9C+Zs=; b=W2C6Bxq5wu1UA1QfSl9tEFnoxUS6V6DKiGyd/uvS38N0FYNhKOwnurIA1chN/4vlv8 5j90Jp/Kuox81VFJS9j4nmgQrSOZdtbJ9kcurMIIfPDtiPkFH760DmX5xgI//uvikfxX w7Q9NgNlpRvWpNdP4QWitn7V9SOwi+1ea1mUSyo1IMGiD8oZ8ihdkAyzwlI3E3p1An51 W+a0trOSqU/439b4cdXEQsczEdpZkXaU67TqgNHSxFhPQgtJggN45CR53YwzHjTrXvgD nD7b1N/NhpXsrWc8mhVlP6O1d5npKf22IQBnSl/Z4xEwldLPFvZSWog9avaCTTN8PPfZ u9nw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720135874; x=1720740674; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yV31MLVU18h28LglrXbc9JoAwLdGpc1PrAHCw/9C+Zs=; b=TiA6LWTVrpUbxVwbloWnPXl142uG4zLeWk39g6u6S7FxWDr8vhqR2Ory6JF6/Os29+ GEH2vybLfKiyxqZRYfJU2WI0DJiM52X8kDMftalHC0/gxQrCdwDZ1Qd8eAH/gvbEKXlW 848EJGDoFet8nYxV6Tj/vhu3n7lkpr3NSB4cretQVtsjiWk3YItPWZKcLxXuwQguhc8c n8vQMM/+W/fQBBfIjKt/Fvrhs3vcy6Wnn4qRETgw5IhSLXRw9vc/M2xkRYrHuMR8/ziW OCix8uwv5QFCK1vqDXFYPImEFktsJK4FMV7r2IgBePnTiDjf0y3DcJnmZPby1QsRXnLH XfPA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVBi9xNIhaNnkBaurbUBet0Y9m3cGt4dZk5s2FBc43kdzbzF4Z3fxRHGxf8hBDqg4Qs/H+GizxX8yxUia5AhOmGFvs1tqWdT45b46O4FNSIO30IkI3xMzEHAh7v40dYvnvHoCwm0NUgztScHH6kdiSrCqrE9jrnm/VpSYEgc8FkI/M7SC7FRv2ibFU=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw3SO7FbJbJv4Q9KR/HUTgcz/ppAuHUlkcCS9QasWIWZCJremwG 8DXyczNfWvgom/jtQrdFDqvs/JSjEnBImSMeb7iG2NvLPe1At7lB
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGuHf++xXq/XdL23OvdvFzHGbU2UZLG6ePiGyjBXLzTwNYHylh69iiai53mgOR2xhQYjvGi6g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:a16:b0:2c1:c648:1c50 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c99c556f37mr1992801a91.17.1720135873730; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 16:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-69-181-169-15.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [69.181.169.15]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c99aab8e04sm2090348a91.56.2024.07.04.16.31.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jul 2024 16:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <83888B13-D77A-483B-B08E-66BBB9AF3B3F@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_49B61C4E-1DE1-4530-A09F-BDA6967CC7C0"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.8\))
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 16:31:11 -0700
In-Reply-To: <DU2PR02MB101603134893C129D606A271288F92@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
To: BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
References: <171743797081.42914.4518891340142384843@ietfa.amsl.com> <DU2PR02MB1016077CA409CD39DB09F04E988F82@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CABY-gOOhPR=3nixD2qwW99i9DArYNiY3Xk-w258B2Pa4vqz2bg@mail.gmail.com> <DU2PR02MB101603134893C129D606A271288F92@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.8)
Message-ID-Hash: LPSMI4EFQHTBP26UNZWLLQSJ4T5ZTLAN
X-Message-ID-Hash: LPSMI4EFQHTBP26UNZWLLQSJ4T5ZTLAN
X-MailFrom: mjethanandani@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: [RTG-DIR]Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-07
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/uvu8whaqWE4vFDdy9pD-8n5Qbbw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Med,

> On Jun 5, 2024, at 1:16 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> 
> (4) the security section does not follow the template + does not cover the IANA module. Please refer tohttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-11#name-security-considerations-sect <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-11#name-security-considerations-sect>.

The iana-msd-types module in draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang, much like most IANA modules, does not define any data nodes that are writeable, readable or have RPCs defined for them. It is only defines a bunch of identities. Is there a reason to insist that the draft should call out security considerations for such modules?

Thanks.


Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status