Re: [mpls] draft-zzhang-intarea-generic-delivery-functions

Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 18 February 2021 23:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF433A1A0A; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:49:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQNken16VU1k; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:49:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A38D53A19FC; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:49:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id k22so9448683ljg.3; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:49:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5lg+TcFlAodmV5TtCQy/Cgow5/aWxUNKhPSG2H0Xn20=; b=pVlg44yjtYTf0Xg2S/0SZLMmJztOZKIZXCmcJR1sgyYDpCoK4DXysSLw3N+vMtGoc7 1g9kfqwcde1hIQpZ8dsmtc1lakakb4UVFsypGLjf3UuvpvXLDpMBNbwCI8aB42NOTmaZ hTpMDnO4x9+qHp9xNAKUx78QcYS9d4hLNJ+HnYaguxqQHr47SnFIMvhQKSP4x+J0X23o iXsqTXhcTjKcKvFBPZqKqtRfSLzbGfUFLf42402XfIgMNXBWOnPqL5Vd63M9i27ujaSH YmcPjfxgT67PV6/jmr3vbUJ+ciNHzdhQot8sj51IMwtbcOwL9u+L1EHkpTaxHg4pv2rN RhnA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5lg+TcFlAodmV5TtCQy/Cgow5/aWxUNKhPSG2H0Xn20=; b=VCk9rwwx4TN83HVbIglOTB2oCaXyb+0pt6MLcQGZOufaOdO6PCqpnHGYtkZ5K1yUO/ bAryw8RcDnjaYbu9SvQi3x7jMnZYoxZL6esRRAHPK4wd8FC1ee3bkmCDWNJPWuwxquo1 lvRqX4tpvfSer/R3iOmZp7btOfV10qt/69jiqAxtf9YPyd2bi+bQMnLHdxGtPrAkWzan JLSHdOpDsGkOy2Douvsil7m8iX6Is8TJBSTTUvmQIRmoqiXT9AXaHzWY1S1fMW0Z3O5E Aqu6wtJE5dKjwZOBnYd+5PfSsfiDQiRKVeslXwsL4BHHgZaMldIm8b0P4VUyWzeO0wXG NtUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532DxIRKvK9o0R55Z2TzhyWzWppI7p9+M7Wwpco8kaTRBe+Yw7vm vt4YpGrbUFJv4bg2De22s5MBSG7G2L2M3iEcIw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZOpE362ItRPPAl9jZ8G8QY3lpeQgPfkIHNmmy0jjV9SG7zsZvA3lvPvwbnK3q3VmLwrFmJwsUJIHFfnaf67A=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:42d3:: with SMTP id n19mr3888474lfl.447.1613692158984; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:49:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR05MB59813CFC28F62CC076364991D4AA0@MN2PR05MB5981.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <F30F0C17-39A6-4D43-AC94-727BC2C9EEC4@gmail.com> <CAMZsk6fqgTXFys7fL-1aZpT-V1j_1MoZhwHyOxKEkFWJN2TJyw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMZsk6fqgTXFys7fL-1aZpT-V1j_1MoZhwHyOxKEkFWJN2TJyw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:49:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMZsk6dPOUDNrGafkOVRgH02K4LWtxU_sCa7f60OZzLwn5Y2wQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "<rtg-ads@ietf.org>" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e9c6ae05bba4fbfe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/v4qqilvNAjp_P0mY_vtXbHBlAkc>
Subject: Re: [mpls] draft-zzhang-intarea-generic-delivery-functions
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 23:49:23 -0000

Hi Stewart,
Hi Xiao, Loa,
FYI:
I believe the latest revision (06) addresses this comment. Welcome your
feedback on that.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr-06

Thanks for your review.
Regards,
Rakesh

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 3:57 PM Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Stewart,
> Thanks for your comments. If we have a mechanism like following, does that
> address the issue?
>
>    1. IOAM header is part of the MPLS encapsulation, any other control
>    word is added after the IOAM header in the data packet.
>    2. The transit nodes can process the IOAM data field(s) after the EOS
>    in data packets as it is proposed.
>    3. The decapsulating node removes the MPLS encapsulation including the
>    IOAM header and then processes the other control word following it.
>
>    0                   1                   2                   3
>
>    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>    | IOAM Indicator Label                  | TC  |1|  TTL          |
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<-+
>
>    |0 0 0 1|Version| Reserved      | IOAM G-ACh                    |  |
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  |
>
>    | Reserved      | Block Number  | IOAM-OPT-Type |IOAM HDR Length|  |
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  I
>
>    |                                                               |  O
>
>    |                                                               |  A
>
>    ~                 IOAM Option and Data Space                    ~  M
>
>    |                                                               |  |
>
>    |                                                               |  |
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<-+
>
>    |0 0 0 0| Rsved | This Header   | Header Length | Next Header   |
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>    ~              Variable field per “This header”                 ~
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>    |                                                               |
>
>    |                                                               |
>
>    ~                 Payload Packet                                ~
>
>    |                                                               |
>
>    |                                                               |
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
> Thanks,
> Rakesh
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:00 AM Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Jeffery
>>
>> Please see the note that I sent about iOAM who also want to sit after BoS
>> … and both of you want the same space that PALS and DetNet is already using.
>>
>> We plan to have a joint session on this hosted by PALS at the next IETF,
>> but I think we also need to include the iOAM people.
>>
>> This has scope to get very messy as we find new candidates for BoS
>> metadata so we really need to take a holistic position to ensure the future
>> health the MPLS protocol.
>>
>> - Stewart
>>
>>
>> > On 12 Jan 2021, at 14:27, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <zzhang@juniper.net>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I just posted
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-intarea-generic-delivery-functions/
>> .
>> >
>> > The initial version was posted to the tsvwg (
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzhang-tsvwg-generic-transport-functions-00).
>> After discussions/feedback we are re-homing it to intarea wg. This new
>> version also contains quite some changes based on the comments and feedback
>> that we received (special thanks to Stewart).
>> >
>> > Comments and suggestions are appreciated.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> > Jeffrey
>> >
>> > Juniper Business Use Only
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>