Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label
Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Tue, 27 July 2010 14:24 UTC
Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4213A695E for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.537
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.537 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DXVmt3Sm0+T6 for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FF73A6A02 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgcFAKOITkxAZnwM/2dsb2JhbACBRJ4icaYuggcLAZk2hTYEiGo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.55,268,1278288000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="139789679"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com ([64.102.124.12]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Jul 2010 14:24:04 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6REO4qe004097 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:24:04 GMT
Received: from dhcp-24f9.meeting.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id o6REO2609450; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:24:03 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <4C4EEC02.2040202@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:24:02 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mpls@ietf.org
References: <02ac01cb2d87$a1c83ac0$c7728182@china.huawei.com> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB3331639844EED6E7@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> <034201cb2d8f$25cd0ec0$c7728182@china.huawei.com> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB3331639844EED714@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB3331639844EED714@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040801090106080901090608"
Subject: Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:24:01 -0000
John Why do you prefer to use an ELI as opposed to using a new set of FECs with the property that they are followed by an EL? Stewart On 27/07/2010 14:31, John E Drake wrote: > > Lucy, > > Yes it does. That is the whole point. That is how the egress knows > whether the ingress has placed an entropy label in the stack. (That > is why we termed it the 'Entropy Label Indicator'.) > > Thanks, > > John > > *From:* Yong Lucy [mailto:lucyyong@huawei.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 27, 2010 6:25 AM > *To:* John E Drake; Kireeti Kompella; 'Shane Amante'; mpls@ietf.org > *Subject:* RE: [mpls] entropy label indicator label > indraft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label > > What is the benefit for such control? Egress LSR does not use this value. > > Lucy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* John E Drake [mailto:jdrake@juniper.net] > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 27, 2010 8:10 AM > *To:* Yong Lucy; Kireeti Kompella; 'Shane Amante'; mpls@ietf.org > *Subject:* RE: [mpls] entropy label indicator label > indraft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label > > Lucy, we discussed this and decided it was better to have the egress > control the values of the ELI it advertises. Plus, getting a reserved > value would be difficult > > *From:* mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] *On > Behalf Of *Yong Lucy > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 27, 2010 5:31 AM > *To:* Kireeti Kompella; 'Shane Amante'; mpls@ietf.org > *Subject:* [mpls] entropy label indicator label in > draft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label > > Hi Kireeti and Shane, > > Could we consider use one of reserved label for ELI purpose? This will > make implementation much easy, i.e. not need to keep the state for > each ELI label. The approach can be used in general for RSVP-TE and > BGP as well. > > Regards, > > Lucy > > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls -- For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator labelindraft-k… Yong Lucy
- [mpls] entropy label indicator label in draft-kom… Yong Lucy
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label in draft… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-… Yong Lucy
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-… Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-… Yong Lucy
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-… Shane Amante
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label in draft… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-… Yong Lucy
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label indraft-… Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator labelindraft-k… Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator labelindraft-k… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator labelindraft-k… Yong Lucy
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator labelindraft-k… Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator labelindraft-k… Yong Lucy
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator labelindraft-k… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator -- single, com… Kireeti Kompella