Re: [mpls] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-06

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Mon, 10 December 2018 05:57 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DBD127332; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 21:57:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B45mfm2JLPCW; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 21:57:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com (mail-pl1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6263C1274D0; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 21:57:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id y1so4711314plp.9; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:57:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=M4Oz+1k9rvYNGOHgtK5HKJfiTAVnlManDjyVIKePgcM=; b=Y1sdQJmydhqCcG5GAOO3WT+9A4iom48FNLHVWmCHyYlt1l2p8i2LC1BP/bLbq6BWhv B2o38kl5ux+bgjQQ9mmQc8BrpJZ50F0El8EOohIrLQzWBiigiIplXrOptaWpBtv0FG6H n7pmjVI3669QdFjZeeLrhUlN3QQatLjhQ/iDAC6ok7C+F5Y2y4NIhV+c4EWvMFfXSJgQ r+/GBWFp6xFWurIlZ1jKjIu1UwoUpWirIxliPbU4FZTZPbbhR/rIY/leoyYOkLdUMVXV TJwYgfL5jlzSZvSvyO4NZyM2FqA+udM+VzwL01M83bJkM+rqQcWo/U4/lk7M4sI0fa4N VCaA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=M4Oz+1k9rvYNGOHgtK5HKJfiTAVnlManDjyVIKePgcM=; b=CUwQjCjLVDis53h2pujIxIWDcKyfdNPkyQno7pOGBLMo4THOVh05Q5ffobEy4T4cRp Mh19PQgtwX6/IIcot30tzYKCVNxkZLX2SGbRIMNSZPfj4vRMD4bSRjjpWSsb/cQ8i2xc hHpzGV94MlIvcReo6GSx2sXMeTzsb7DoZMlApxiJf3qH//W5iHAw5heXEon1H2wH5SjL e9xTjbr3jT886y/2iI5rleEkLfTxXz+lWrNlzjgdDxoUtY+GdlEsb7mEX5HwP8NqX3Wr HH0lhW/qyRk3BN9dItrnYx0bjidpVX8hKi8IOSw45DMDLvvsExtVg3FqrQXH4Gu+wfbb gGqA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbRi9qFsO6/qXhVQIhnW5tFDjpGjpdiqP89AW3/z/1i71G6Kihh wt84OO/94sgIzflwb901rWtLK1/SE2Ulk0lktBVt7bcA
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WMwZVwkQBJKEYfDahYlsxHxOphELVxVujZkb4/4cT7ZCUBjVlcGps223cDdUEtcZlaQfiDqXnC/Vmr4jzC8ok=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:42e4:: with SMTP id h91mr11172465pld.18.1544421447776; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:57:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <154360254979.27470.14714094577368742271@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <154360254979.27470.14714094577368742271@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:57:16 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTt6orUKqcTDdyugcerozMGbg6WTF===mmZBra8Xx6xzEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: housley@vigilsec.com
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, IETF MPLS List <mpls@ietf.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c740c0057ca4a3b1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/vEDfZv9ibsPMTmx0lLYiKAuDBO8>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-06
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 05:57:34 -0000

Russ, Hi!

Much Thanks for the review! We just posted a new rev (-07) to address your
comments. Please do go through the diffs (
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-07.txt)
and let us know if the new version adequately addresses your concern.

The term "loose hop" was introduced in RFC3209. So we just added a
reference to it in the relevant sentence.

Regards,
-Pavan (on behalf of the authors)

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 1:29 PM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-06
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2018-11-30
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-12-11
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
>
> Summary: Ready
>
>
> Major Concerns:
>
> None
>
>
> Minor Concerns:
>
> Section 5.3: To understand this section, I had to learn about "loose
> hops" from other sources.  Please consider adding this term to the ones
> that are defined in Section 2.
>
>
> Nits:
>
> Throughout document: s/hop by hop/hop-by-hop/
>
> Section 5.3.1: s/The net result is that by/As a result, by/
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>