Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field

"Vullo, Anthony D (Tony)" <tony.vullo@verizonbusiness.com> Thu, 21 August 2008 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mpls-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mpls-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772BF3A68F8; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA8C3A6C6B for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nn2On-9YoeZl for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ashesmtp03.verizonbusiness.com (ashesmtp03.verizonbusiness.com [198.4.8.167]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B983A6BB1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dgismtp06.wcomnet.com ([166.38.58.89]) by firewall.verizonbusiness.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02 (built Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0K5W00F1RVZG8R00@firewall.verizonbusiness.com> for mpls@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:14:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dgismtp06.wcomnet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by dgismtp06.mcilink.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.08 (built Sep 22 2005)) with SMTP id <0K5W00L7LVZGMX@dgismtp06.mcilink.com> for mpls@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:14:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ASHSRV141.mcilink.com ([153.39.68.167]) by dgismtp06.mcilink.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.08 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5W00KGTVZFIH@dgismtp06.mcilink.com> for mpls@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:14:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ASHEVS010.mcilink.com ([153.39.69.135]) by ASHSRV141.mcilink.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:14:02 +0000
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:14:02 +0000
From: "Vullo, Anthony D (Tony)" <tony.vullo@verizonbusiness.com>
In-reply-to: <C4CF528C.612B%swallow@cisco.com>
To: mpls@ietf.org
Message-id: <4FF8ED3A11AC8E4F975C55066345E4E305F31234@ASHEVS010.mcilink.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Thread-topic: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field
Thread-index: AckBcE00i7UqvG1jEd2DSgAewhIyZgBgA0wg
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
References: <C4CF528C.612B%swallow@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Aug 2008 18:14:02.0902 (UTC) FILETIME=[8684B360:01C902F0]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:03:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mpls-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@ietf.org

No.

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
George Swallow
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:24 PM
To: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field

During the last call on "EXP field" renamed to  "CoS Field"
draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def-04.txt, there were comments on alternatives
to the name COS.

This message initiates a two week poll on whether the name COS is good
enough, or if some other name is needed.  The poll closes
23:59 Sept 1 GMT. 

Please answer with a simple yes or no.  You may send any additional
comment in a separate message (with a different subject line).

...George

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls