Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 10 May 2016 05:48 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DD712B02C; Mon, 9 May 2016 22:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id abd48wh6mXwP; Mon, 9 May 2016 22:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A36B212B004; Mon, 9 May 2016 22:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.43.232] (unknown [5.114.129.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9312E18013C8; Tue, 10 May 2016 07:47:53 +0200 (CEST)
To: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <b52802ea-0ee0-9e93-b06b-1b82f0ca23b7@pi.nu> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221A6B7DE@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <fdd0787a-d6d7-b1bc-9256-3e2cf2ebb637@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:47:20 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221A6B7DE@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/vk5KmZRRv34Nhi52jo8jI3xP3dE>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 05:48:07 -0000

Greg,

On 2016-05-10 05:42, Gregory Mirsky wrote:
> Hi Loa, et. al,
> I've read the draft and support it moving forward.
>
> One minor question I have is to the allocation policy of the LDP Targeted Application Identifier from the 0x7FFF - 0xFFFE range.

Good catch, all the code points need to be covered by policies, the
authors should come up with a proposal and share with the working
group.

/Loa
>
> 	Regards,
> 		Greg
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 7:06 PM
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp
>
> Working Group,
>
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp.
>
> Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org).
>
> There were one IPR disclosure against the individual draft that this document replaced.
>
> The document shepherd and working group chairs are frequently asked about the working group discussions related to any IPR disclosures.
>
> We like to remind the working group that discussion on the content and validity of an IPR disclosure should not take place on the MPLS wg list or any IETF mailing lists.
>
> However we are looking for simple statements whether you think the working group should continue progress the document, regardless of an existing IPR disclosure. Please include this information in your "support/do not support" when responding to working group adoption calls and last calls.
>
> All the authors and contributors (with one exception) have stated on the working group mailing list that they are not aware of any other IPRs that relates to this draft.
>
> This working group last call ends May 22, 2016.
>
>
> /Loa
> for the MPLS wg chairs
>