Re: [mpls] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology.txt

[Kireeti Kompella <[e-mail]>]

I’m not aware of any IPR that relates to this draft.

Cheers,
Kireeti
________________________________
From: Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2020 5:14:21 PM
To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology.txt

Nic,

I'm not aware of any IPR that relates to this draft.


/Loa

On 17/02/2020 23:23, [e-mail] wrote:
> Dear Working Group,
>
> We are currently preparing draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology for working
> group last call.
>
> Part of this preparation is to do an IPR poll.
>
> This mail is to start the IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> There are no IPR disclosure directly against
> draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Best regards
>
>     Nic
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!W2TRXCBgwTZsKahIl7mOLX_B3nnRYNzZx_Oqeb7Dcjj3TbIdKBz9J8zSW-k7gkA$
>

--


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]


Juniper Business Use Only