[mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPLS Echo Request' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05.txt)

"Amanda Baber via RT" <drafts-approval@iana.org> Fri, 03 April 2015 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E63051A1B17; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 15:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1751A1AC2 for <xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 15:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UJjDZpARMHKw for <xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 15:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBC741A1AF0 for <draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 15:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org ([192.0.33.81]:47725 helo=smtp1.lax.icann.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <iana-shared@icann.org>) id 1Ye9m2-0000DQ-MH for draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 15:09:11 -0700
Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp1.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t33M95Ex002412 for <draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 22:09:05 GMT
Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1E9E7C2081E; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 22:09:05 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-approval@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150325222459.19546.84118.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-815506@icann.org> <20150325222459.19546.84118.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.2.9-28999-1428098944-1488.815506-7-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #815506
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 22:09:05 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.0.33.81
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: iana-shared@icann.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
Resent-To: draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150403220911.BBC741A1AF0@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 15:09:11 -0700
Resent-From: iana-shared@icann.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools/0ermD5YXybajEUO_dGsK8Blpi8M>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/vy1aOl3Z_UsjLSN73LjCg7wPyQk>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPLS Echo Request' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05.txt)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: drafts-approval@iana.org
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 22:09:33 -0000

Dear Authors,

We have two questions about the assignments requested by this document:

1) Which range should be used for the TLV registrations? 

0-16383	Standards Action (This range is for mandatory TLVs or for optional TLVs that require an error message if not recognized.)
16384-31743	Specification Required (Experimental RFC needed)
32768-49161	Standards Action (This range is for optional TLVs that can be silently dropped if not recognized.)
49162-64511	Specification Required (Experimental RFC needed)

2) Can you confirm that we should make the Message Types assignment from the Standards Action range (0-191) , rather than the Specification Required range (192-255)? 

Please see
http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters

thanks,

Amanda Baber
IANA Request Specialist
ICANN