Re: [mpls] Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP-based LSPs

"Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com> Wed, 07 December 2016 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <sprevidi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6031288B8; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 01:30:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u4D53zJneMKb; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 01:30:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C408127A90; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 01:30:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2904; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1481103024; x=1482312624; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=mC9klTbO2G0DHb+bBml4qNKMZzMkq85c6TLkmv7XP2w=; b=K9tKAtyBFGvcTjKvyxbvgYWKBwjvqLOlGDRIgR7kuGxYMK7RVfGkqhTK yw2/v3iS0rqEhNtoLDxofuEA6Z4O+x6iq2jSEcCAetoji+UzpJ4RAa+e8 hCtP/7vWz1/Wpt406zV0U2nVy4LqQEfzybgYMPE6JyK3/D/Qyt8uRgpY0 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AZAQB31UdY/4MNJK1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgzkBAQEBAR9agQYHjUGXD5R+ggceDYV3AhqCAz8UAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEaAEBAQIBAQEBIRE6CwULAgEIDgoCAiYCAgIlCxUQAgQOBRuITAgOqTGCKYs9AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFwWBC4UzgX0IglaHTC2CMAWaZgGRF4FzhH2JT44DhA0BHzeBGSMOAQGFInIBiDiBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,310,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="180411309"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 07 Dec 2016 09:30:22 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com (xch-rtp-010.cisco.com [64.101.220.150]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uB79UMgk018539 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Dec 2016 09:30:22 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com (64.101.220.150) by XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com (64.101.220.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 04:30:22 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) by XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 04:30:22 -0500
From: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
To: Santosh Esale <sesale@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP-based LSPs
Thread-Index: AQHSUGyI42CgudWQb0KCXEIVVUAA6g==
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 09:30:21 +0000
Message-ID: <A6136F9F-7820-4E76-BD0D-630B0B82C904@cisco.com>
References: <D46B0792.DB8E0%sesale@juniper.net> <03cfb8de-649d-9f26-01f1-a5f1a8181e9b@gredler.at> <D46C7FC2.DBBA3%sesale@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <D46C7FC2.DBBA3%sesale@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.169.58]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <384B6E12C9C02041B30AB37AABC08E1D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/w01uBfNFvi_vqHp90QKe_kyzNPM>
Cc: Hannes Gredler <hannes@gredler.at>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP-based LSPs
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 09:30:26 -0000

> On Dec 6, 2016, at 11:55 PM, Santosh Esale <sesale@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Hannes,
>          Good point! We will generalize the solution to cover
> segment-routing (SR) too in the next - 05 revision.


I don’t think your solution brings anything better than what already covered in ti-lfa draft for segment-routing. See draft-francois-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-02.

s.


> 
> Thanks,
> Santosh
> 
> On 12/6/16, 3:17 AM, "Hannes Gredler" <hannes@gredler.at> wrote:
> 
>> hi santosh,
>> 
>> just curious why the proposed solution is constrained to only use LDP ?
>> 
>> IMO what you have suggested here would just fit nicely for protecting
>> segment-routing node labels as well. segment routing node-labels are
>> "calculated" in a similar fashion than LDP labels as such my guess would
>> be that this solution applies to SR node labels as well.
>> 
>> suggest to generalize it to:
>> "Fast Reroute for Node Protection in hop-by-hop based LSPs"
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> /hannes
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/5/16 20:59, Santosh Esale wrote:
>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>                           We have presented the draft
>>> - draft-esale-mpls-ldp-node-frr – in
>>> MPLS working group in three IETF meetings including the latest one at
>>> Seul. 
>>> However, as the draft is of interest to routing working too, we are
>>> initiating this 
>>> thread to solicit feedbacks from the routing working group. Please let
>>> us know
>>> your comments.
>>> 
>>> Presentations - 
>>> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/slides/slides-93-mpls-3.pdf
>>> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-mpls-3.pptx
>>> 
>>> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-mpls-08-ti-frr-ietf-
>>> 97-00.pptx
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Santosh (on behalf of authors)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtgwg mailing list
>>> rtgwg@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg