[mpls] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk-12

Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 11 November 2024 19:08 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <173135208908.745389.4871263949002977458@dt-datatracker-5f77bcf4bd-4q5pd>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:08:09 -0800
Message-ID-Hash: WSML5HPL6Q246TJ2Y3PR7REIDVZSUVXU
CC: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
Reply-To: Jouni Korhonen <jounikor@gmail.com>
Subject: [mpls] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk-12
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/wSViq9eZWFR_mvEtf7MLhv5cwHs>

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk-??
Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review Date: 2024-11-11
IETF LC End Date: 2024-11-11
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Document is ready and I do not have any major issues with it. It was
even readable for someone not too familiar with MNA before starting to read the
document (and the associated requirements RFC).

Major issues: None.

Minor issues: None.

Nits/editorial comments: What I would like to see as a non-MNA person are few
illustrations of label stack how different elaborated aproaches would look
like. Those would make the document a lot more readable/informational.

[mpls] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls… Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker