Re: [mpls] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology.txt

"Adrian Farrel" <> Mon, 17 February 2020 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219EF120879; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:38:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.617
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.617 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sINiCG2ssPmb; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:37:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ED7E12088D; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:37:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 01HFbcFK024521; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:37:38 GMT
Received: from (unknown []) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A031622040; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:37:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D7C2203A; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:37:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 01HFbbbV009683 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:37:38 GMT
Reply-To: <>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <>
To: <>, <>, <>, <>
References: <LEJPR01MB02011BC0481648EAAFBFE8A698160@LEJPR01MB0201.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE>
In-Reply-To: <LEJPR01MB02011BC0481648EAAFBFE8A698160@LEJPR01MB0201.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:37:38 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <025701d5e5a8$2feff8a0$8fcfe9e0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0258_01D5E5A8.2FEFF8A0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQIjBM0znyG755YyqwOlm5MNdd9Ly6eFQ+Ng
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--21.264-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--21.264-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Result: 10--21.263800-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: TmlY9+XBoTlor4mPA3EMtnFPUrVDm6jtfkuZtv/FS5q6Gxh0eXo7a7GF +Vo4vAw60ZEtEs12QpxVIIpqOHmPD16l23lOYahrlVHM/F6YkvQ+8WcgUjQUwlrXKFPCbXO5hgN g2jxUva0pKL4JCVj87vA5UD89aEeI+97eQiaobwVcrmR4Jr5uaCPzwxRW6FMjIP+10zuKi87jeF rqWAmtl0GD9gTHF6jOBz+GriIUvDr2DHDk8DmSSJcIvv9Vuk84bKA7yD1j1eB0PA/ki2kI7LnqJ NXIccKryd44Sucb672v8TAvJrvuV7QJ4oUF56vogRTWSf0X8xmOz/LLJUcaHsmqrXFLFjsW6aX8 TYIrj1uFZCZln65Hjr+9aYYmK0YhLVuvfElvBpwxNOsBwNfn/ns0iNyjUNXyDC/Vm90If4V0NOB 2+sLcHo0id0pIhqxTK3l+VnEbL+iiqgrnLPR5UmhQCsqhuTNi/OQ5e4ND2fGyy072phvASaPFjJ EFr+ol4E9s12Gvf51cLc3sLtjOt9xWF9NJ0ly4KzfM9B6IRt7+efAnnZBiL6SszSEYZXnD1hZQB WhQEgMSbpsSUU5kHhIkL/dfE9gIbjPz+y310up+3BndfXUhXQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:38:05 -0000

Hi Nic,


I am not aware of any IPR that needs to be disclosed relevant to this draft.





From: <> 
Sent: 17 February 2020 15:24
Subject: IPR Poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology.txt


Dear Working Group,


We are currently preparing draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology for working group
last call.


Part of this preparation is to do an IPR poll.


This mail is to start the IPR poll.


Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology?


If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see
RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).


There are no IPR disclosure directly against


If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The
response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The document will
not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
author and contributor.


If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR
that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.


Best regards