Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
 (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05131A0276; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:49:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.435
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No,
 score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
 RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UpBZmwrp5IkO;
 Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:49:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775C81A0264;
 Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:49:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 02351a-maguilar.corp.zynga.com ([199.48.105.4]) (authenticated
 bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0RImiKS042439
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
 Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:48:44 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <52E6AA0B.1050600@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:48:43 -0800
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/27.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>, "stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>
References: <201401240320.s0O3KsR9013700@maildrop2.v6ds.occnc.com>
 <52E2BBC0.2030203@isi.edu> <52E68C12.2050308@cisco.com>
 <98034F7E-47CF-4ABE-A199-A9DB4DACBC2E@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <98034F7E-47CF-4ABE-A199-A9DB4DACBC2E@isi.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="OriKbApKhGlWr638DuclAaA0Sme6Slsso"
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:48:45 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating
 MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>,
 <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>,
 <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:49:02 -0000

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--OriKbApKhGlWr638DuclAaA0Sme6Slsso
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 1/27/14, 8:48 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
> Those same mechanisms have provided hardware checksum support for a ver=
y long time.=20


The new header and the payload are actually in different parts of the
forwarding complex until they hit the output queue, you can't checksum
data you don't have.

> Joe
>=20
>> On Jan 27, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> wrote=
:
>>
>>> On 24/01/2014 19:15, Joe Touch wrote:
>>>
>>>> This eliminates the "expands the reach of MPLS argument".
>>>>
>>>> First UDP checksums:
>>>>
>>>>   The UDP checksum is at the beginning of the payload.  Please see
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/current/msg11279.html
>>>>   This makes filling in a new UDP checksum infeasible on most high e=
nd
>>>>   hardware.
>>>
>>> That argument would make sense if most hardware wasn't store-and-forw=
ard on a per-packet basis.
>> They may be store and forward, but most of the high end designs
>> use multiple grades of memory putting the packet in "slow memory"
>> and providing a snapshot of the header in "fast memory" to the
>> forwarder. Thus although the whole packet is in the system, it
>> it is not accessible to the engine that would need to calculate the
>> c/s.
>>
>> Stewart
>=20



--OriKbApKhGlWr638DuclAaA0Sme6Slsso
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlLmqgwACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrJ0zACeJrp+2AtldVjwugnNSUZYioX3
sX0An3nU4rW8YFZ58lK3lkrH/mGl7oX2
=6qzZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--OriKbApKhGlWr638DuclAaA0Sme6Slsso--
