IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels

tejal.parikh@verizon.com Tue, 21 August 2018 03:32 UTC

Return-Path: <tejal.parikh@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0F7130E8F; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=nGrzaAkK; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=pHFTe91S; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=DLHGTf0P
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kCJJ9sbj9Trz; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omzsmtpe01.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe01.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22BB8130E87; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1534822377; x=1566358377; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=hRVGLt8EYeebvo70twq/ssvJGh/sxNHbkTq7bGsbfmM=; b=nGrzaAkK2xkU1xPA15Uy2ZH9kbqeBWU/QxZscX2t9Gtl6QmDDTKoAzk3 2fcm7sdloTDJATVvVE+h8NrFX+8S79hWg0pkRnV/DL32KMj5Kc6g6D7WD gksAbgf4wvXhnzUpFOTtLu9YpHq3P7aO6lYUX3hk5C25FXetxzEEvo0bc E=;
Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi01.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.143]) by omzsmtpe01.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2018 03:32:55 +0000
Received: from rogue-10-255-192-101.rogue.vzwcorp.com (HELO apollo.verizonwireless.com) ([10.255.192.101]) by fldsmtpi01.verizon.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Aug 2018 03:32:31 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1534822350; x=1566358350; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=hRVGLt8EYeebvo70twq/ssvJGh/sxNHbkTq7bGsbfmM=; b=pHFTe91S8TABuloE0qo+N6HeGfPSFXEonTSPW0wjBJPpd6VnR4InPt4R SIoy8Xi82yHqWi+jmYr3gW24zslPEUUI7xm8io9TLEcIKcJiJrtLuMXOt EmuwA/PCMLkaNhChn/fgk+qVoEsyy+QnNJMx7lC1solZeBiNcyd8mLe9+ g=;
Received: from ranger.odc.vzwcorp.com (HELO mercury.verizonwireless.com) ([10.255.240.27]) by apollo.verizonwireless.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Aug 2018 23:32:30 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1534822350; x=1566358350; h=to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from; bh=hRVGLt8EYeebvo70twq/ssvJGh/sxNHbkTq7bGsbfmM=; b=DLHGTf0PY+P9kja74RzQ3Dhd5bnKHkXOhmhcc/QKqvUvgcnkg+IIdtc0 OUEoCtSe9v5sIktJAOmVGTNmRxeCLptFGyVA6zcFAvXyUiLvQBWsV2lux HuNvNflC43znJ65iha2wSajDzovH/7PSLZ6zVldeVmwpad37jpV/O6TOY w=;
From: tejal.parikh@verizon.com
X-Host: ranger.odc.vzwcorp.com
Received: from casac1exh001.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([10.11.218.43]) by mercury.verizonwireless.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA256; 21 Aug 2018 03:32:30 +0000
Received: from scwexch27apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (153.114.130.46) by CASAC1EXH001.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (10.11.218.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:32:29 -0700
Received: from scwexch25apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (153.114.130.44) by scwexch27apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (153.114.130.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:32:28 -0700
Received: from scwexch25apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([153.114.130.44]) by scwexch25apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([153.114.130.44]) with mapi id 15.00.1365.000; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:32:28 -0700
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels
Thread-Index: AQHUOLFUgbpFF7sdpkiPqh4FdqesD6TJjaCw
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 03:32:28 +0000
Message-ID: <c995a8934edb493a93205a82e6a42974@scwexch25apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com>
References: <1dde8c3c-bca6-0a1f-0277-fb10ebca502f@pi.nu> <81FEDBB9-493A-4C07-8BF1-F7185E1E7DC2@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <81FEDBB9-493A-4C07-8BF1-F7185E1E7DC2@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.11.60.250]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/yWlhuK5PC7wHwBJDlBen29If3J0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 03:32:59 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Regards,
Tejal

-----Original Message-----
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:vbeeram@juniper.net] 
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 1:12 PM
To: Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [E] Re: IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels

Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft. The IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules against the draft.

Regards,
-Pavan

On 8/9/18, 4:56 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

    Working Group,
    
    We are currently preparing draft draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels
    for working group last call.
    
    Part of this preparation is to do an IPR poll.
    
    This mail is to start the IPR poll.
    
    Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-
    labels?
    
    If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
    (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
    
    There are no IPR disclosures directly against against draft-ietf-mpls-
    rsvp-shared-labels.
    However there are three IPT disclosures against the individual document
    (draft-sitaraman-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels) that preceded the working
    group document.
    
    If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
    this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
    IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The
    document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
    received from each author and contributor.
    
    If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
    contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
    IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
    
    
    /Loa
      mpls wg co-chair
    -- 
    
    
    Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
    Senior MPLS Expert
    Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email