IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 01 October 2024 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F34C14F695; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 08:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m2oaxjTUkilt; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 08:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4048DC14F689; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 08:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 491F5tN1015343; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 16:05:55 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A1C46054; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 16:05:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42C246052; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 16:05:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 16:05:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (82-69-109-75.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.109.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 491F5sqb010926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Oct 2024 16:05:54 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Joel Halpern' <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, N.Leymann@telekom.de, mpls@ietf.org
References: <BEZP281MB20085D267CFABD1474A4771898772@BEZP281MB2008.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <072e481e-ac01-43cb-a69e-2843f8b4389e@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <072e481e-ac01-43cb-a69e-2843f8b4389e@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 16:05:55 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <053101db1413$6aa14690$3fe3d3b0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0532_01DB141B.CC65FCB0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQIbMl7NzaQq4JUMnr6HRVWhWll6DQMGbyNlsdmOB8A=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 82.69.109.75
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=20221128; bh=zl6ybCzXL79l3rVGVFcMq p7pEP9Re9dyssVGKIvvVFM=; b=0iBT/BAtqcU6/ju2l8wXBUpVSAshEHrG4St8b YPeIl9sH/GqovuOZ/o21EBV/8szbjZKoCx+NnInjmKoreUWE95W9PFw7XiYMzrXt FiV4XH+Sbyp52xSllEXnawj3cB5cgesXSaRqRMDT6NCmy1pC8VXDkuQ6gzKd6Bp8 OaDv4Xk8INhO8lO6iKYiVxsEV3WDIAfy6mzkQm44C+giT54fjEnPKiRLfy4Y7/BR PRMPMXOO84SwN52OE3wUS8/C6+KUbKsEspPp6H/FANomB9Jg3M4QX19QOdYPh8s3 EX/EJ/T7K8Kdh05+4lXfq2OoS1xemiE0JXFVYPgi+/cMBdqjA==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28352.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--25.436-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--25.436-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28352.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--25.436200-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: z5DqD3Ob673aYagUwgwslHFPUrVDm6jtTSz0JdEAJbQtferJ/d7AbwKa ctWS2OYo3UzOQxNIkQH+xFQxqaAGOE8qMrYGIRbXDZs/KgmqdksZskwWqoib3DGQt2RbsLmqKMQ g1p8oR44i/ciNtsxiwt0At+n19DkRI+4KhQ0idxL6zT5BlgBw364XxwhpHh/qyzeZ0EF2JhKPd1 lLIAtF4vF6NzSl6coX+0icYOA5893YEhFHE+qJevZvT2zYoYOwHJd0I5UPjAPCTWWMudqIHxv/r jinePEHgMBtpml0DCBJpV9rHFX3j7MwnTKgkbsOwbRQ2Bpmlio3l2plwgrtWLmyqTXHGxLI387R OTCkGUPCfvo3UgFFJE/XebjNV+vbYwAv5CupnhPfSQNpZkETVNBO21OxlsovB4N9b2b2Ot5SHbZ LlORyz+AmO6TkjG+lFLybjTPFELGvxJaYc6X9S2wKW3BObMxTmRKFhwukYf3mo6V0TE8Jo/qsDm wM7TYMVNcQeUmhVtMqhZrv4f7cO7uADNYt2hb2L4+sB3yBsck920hoyTXBqUIjuk0uJKN9xTPN0 i7ijGH3aCtTBCBhlz64m/GIVehyDPIzF4wRfrAURSScn+QSXlkMvWAuahr8mI+faDiwdhpheV+c rsE6IfAxRSAc0OENIuJieNVvzvp+3BndfXUhXQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Message-ID-Hash: OV5RWXDKX2MBLZC4EV2HVINWJ3UPBBZI
X-Message-ID-Hash: OV5RWXDKX2MBLZC4EV2HVINWJ3UPBBZI
X-MailFrom: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mpls-chairs@ietf.org, draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/y_RjAGYxo5qsLRiA8O6fqcKhU_o>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

I agree with Joel’s wording.

 

I would caveat with “If some people are going to implement this” because there’s probably lots we *could* do with MNA, and some of it might be a good idea, but we need to make sure that we’re only documenting stuff that people are building.

 

[Full disclosure – I have no plans to implement or deploy]

 

Cheers,

Adrian

 

From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> 
Sent: 01 October 2024 15:57
To: N.Leymann@telekom.de; mpls@ietf.org
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org; draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy

 

This seems like a good use of MNA and moves us down a path that I think is beneficial.  As such, I support adoption of this draft.

Yours,

Joel

On 10/1/2024 10:04 AM, N.Leymann@telekom.de <mailto:N.Leymann@telekom.de>  wrote:

Dear WG,

 

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy as a MPLS working group document.

 

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the MPLS working group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org> ). 

Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document 

should not be adopted as a working group document.

 

Currently, there are no IPR disclosure against this document. All the authors/contributors have stated on 

the MPLS WG mailing list that they are unaware of any undisclosed IPRs that relates to this document.

 

This working group adoption poll ends October 16, 2024.

 

Regards,

 

Nic (as MPLS WG co-chair)





_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list -- mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org> 
To unsubscribe send an email to mpls-leave@ietf.org <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status