[mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-03: (with DISCUSS)
Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 12 March 2019 10:53 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3631277D7; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 03:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip@ietf.org, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, loa@pi.nu, mpls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.93.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <155238798836.13888.12133834062700877951.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 03:53:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/yezQWK-QrxbbnwUemQoy1yg3JDM>
Subject: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-03: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:53:08 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-03: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- These points should be easy to resolve: 1) Given section 3.1, the following drafts all seems that they should be normative references: ietf-isis-encapsulation-cap, ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap, ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions, ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions 2) Sec 3.2.3 on IP Header fields should refer to RFC6040 for the ECN field and eventually RFC2983 for DSCP.
- [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-mp… Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
- Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-iet… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-iet… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-iet… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-iet… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-iet… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-iet… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-iet… BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-iet… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-iet… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-iet… Adrian Farrel