[mpls] Suggestion for draft-kompella-mpls-larp-08 section 3.3

Erik Auerswald <auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de> Sat, 18 July 2020 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2543F3A086C; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 08:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAY_BE_FORGED=1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fp0Uw_ACMJcR; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 08:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.uni-kl.de (mailgw1.uni-kl.de [IPv6:2001:638:208:120::220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 530023A086B; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 08:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (x2e720615.dyn.telefonica.de [46.114.6.21] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mailgw1.uni-kl.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id 06IFd1MF102180 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 18 Jul 2020 17:39:09 +0200
To: draft-kompella-mpls-larp@ietf.org
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
From: Erik Auerswald <auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
Message-ID: <7fe4a6aa-ab77-ee10-6c44-b1fc15a0476a@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 17:39:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/yjrdmUIV4tTAaotksmubyGIUFCQ>
Subject: [mpls] Suggestion for draft-kompella-mpls-larp-08 section 3.3
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 15:39:15 -0000

Dear authors,

after reading draft-kompella-mpls-larp-08 (Label Distribution Using
ARP), it seems to me as if the label designations in section 3.3
could be made clearer by always using the same designation for the
same label.  Thus I would suggest to always use "TL3" when referring
to that label, instead of using "TL3", "L1", and "L".

I would suggest to change parts of section 3.3 as follows:

OLD:
   2.  if it does, T1 allocates a label TL3 to reach H3 (if it doesn't
       already have such a label) and installs an L-FIB entry to swap L1
       with the label (stack) to reach H3.

   3.  sends a (proxy) L-ARP reply to H1 with the Source Hardware
       Address (SHA) set to (L, M), where M is T1's metric to H3.  T1
       may also set some attribute bits in the SHA.

NEW:
   2.  if it does, T1 allocates a label TL3 to reach H3 (if it doesn't
       already have such a label) and installs an L-FIB entry to swap TL3
       with the label (stack) to reach H3.

   3.  sends a (proxy) L-ARP reply to H1 with the Source Hardware
       Address (SHA) set to (TL3, M), where M is T1's metric to H3.  T1
       may also set some attribute bits in the SHA.

Thanks,
Erik