[mpls] Closed - Re: Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time as an MPLS wg document.

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Mon, 03 August 2015 06:06 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB351B2CC2 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 23:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hFZFCwsB8CY2 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 23:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E2881B2CA1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 23:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1594418013BE; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 08:06:09 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <55BF04C9.1030505@pi.nu>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:06:01 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <559D5FB2.9060800@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <559D5FB2.9060800@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/ypQ3yrkqidgTVRtDIRfoXRkj3Nw>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time@tools.ietf.org" <draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Closed - Re: Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time as an MPLS wg document.
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 06:06:13 -0000

Working Group,

This wg adoption poll is closed. We have a new mpls wg document.

Can the authors please post the document as
draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time
without any other changes than filename, version number and dates.

/Loa
for the wg chairs

On 2015-07-08 19:36, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-mirsky-
> mpls-residence-time as an MPLS working group document.
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
> There are no IPR disclosures against this document. However, we have
> started an IPR poll in parallel to the adoption poll.
>
> This poll ends July 24, 2015.
>
> /Loa
>