Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-farrelll-mpls-opportunistic-encrypt as an MPLS wg document

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Seems odd to "support" one's own draft, but sure, I do:-)

I think defining this mechanism at this layer fills a gap
in the set of ways in which we can defend networks so is
well worth doing.

S.


On 18/06/15 12:01, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Speaking as a co-author of this draft I am enthusiastic about getting
> more eyes on the material and particularly an understanding of
> whether the proposal is practical in implementation.
> 
> I think that bringing the work inside the working group will help
> achieve that.
> 
> Cheers, Adrian
> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: Loa Andersson [mailto:[e-mail]] 
>> Sent: 18 June 2015 10:12 To: [e-mail];
>> [e-mail] Cc:
>> [e-mail] Subject: Poll to see if we have
>> consensus to adopt draft-farrelll-mpls- opportunistic-encrypt as an
>> MPLS wg document
>> 
>> Working Group,
>> 
>> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-farrelll- 
>> mpls-opportunistic-encrypt-05 as an MPLS working group document.
>> 
>> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls
>> working group mailing list ([e-mail]). Please give a
>> technical motivation for your support/not support, especially if
>> you think that the document should not be adopted as a working
>> group document.
>> 
>> There are no IPR disclosures directly against this document. An
>> IPR poll has been started in parallel to the adoption poll.
>> 
>> This poll ends July 2, 2015.
>> 
>> /Loa MPLS wg co-chair --
>> 
>> 
>> Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail] 
>> Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail] Huawei
>> Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]
> 
>