Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Tue, 13 September 2022 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BE5C1522C5; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 17:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4JZAAjTIoVNV; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 17:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8031BC14CF10; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 17:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MRPCm4cFkz67yyZ; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 08:16:52 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi500010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.191) by fraeml711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 02:18:09 +0200
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.199) by kwepemi500010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.191) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 08:18:07 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.199]) by kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.199]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 08:18:07 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Poll on way forward for MNA solution
Thread-Index: AQHYwiGADMn7dxeBrU+s8T0Dsgrhra3charg
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:18:07 +0000
Message-ID: <c10dc9b75ec94677bfa515fb3ee38efd@huawei.com>
References: <7c419233-7cba-1bb0-740d-34e09f149efe@pi.nu> <DS0PR19MB650143C4F4C1B9BF3E60C888FC7A9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <bc67ab72-e36c-cd5f-27aa-0441c4ee093c@pi.nu> <DS0PR19MB65019CECC654037542FC2588FC7E9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DS0PR19MB65019CECC654037542FC2588FC7E9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.41.183]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_c10dc9b75ec94677bfa515fb3ee38efdhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/yzEP4cgYxFPv2IVhCooiblNLDc4>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:18:17 -0000

Hi Chairs,

The poll statement is confusing.
I support one solution. I hope this solution could be from:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-mpls-mna-encaps/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kompella-mpls-mspl4fa/

I support multiple documents on one solution for ISD, PSD, etc.

This solution should be extensible. I do not support a new "unified" draft for all components.

Cheers,
Tianran

From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tarek Saad
Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 2:50 AM
To: mpls@ietf.org
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org; pals-chairs@ietf.org; DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution

Dear MPLS WG and MPLS Open DT,

Over the past months, the MPLS Open DT has reviewed several proposals for the packet encodings for the MNA solution.
A compilation of the multiple solutions brought forward is present at https://trac.ietf.org/trac/mpls/wiki/MNADocumnets.

We believe that currently there are two alternative ways to progress the MNA solution.
One of them requires a single unified solution, and the other allows for individual solutions to progress independently.
We expect any unified solution to document the pieces from the presented solutions that are discussed and agreed upon in the weekly MPLS Open DT meeting.
The co-chairs for the working groups hosting the Open MPLS DT are polling the WG on their preference to move forward.
Please respond with either:
    A) "I support the MPLS Open DT bringing forward a single unified solution"
    OR
    B) "I support progressing the individual solution(s) independently"

We will allow this poll to run for two weeks (ending on Sept 19th).

Regards,
Tarek (for the MPLS Open DT co-chairs)