[mpls] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8287 (6101)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 30 April 2020 18:28 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77413A0DCF; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e-GK8UzcAnGH; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1831D3A0EBA; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3AFAAF40711; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: alexander.vainshtein@ecitele.com, naikumar@cisco.com, cpignata@cisco.com, swallow.ietf@gmail.com, nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com, sriganeshkini@gmail.com, mach.chen@huawei.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: db3546@att.com, iesg@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200430182810.3AFAAF40711@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:28:10 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/zsdPBISIDkX9qOnJDZ8lcIs51as>
Subject: [mpls] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8287 (6101)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 18:28:30 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC8287, "Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Traceroute for Segment Routing (SR) IGP-Prefix and IGP-Adjacency Segment Identifiers (SIDs) with MPLS Data Planes". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6101 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: Alexander ("Sasha") Vainshtein <alexander.vainshtein@ecitele.com> Date Reported: 2020-04-13 Held by: Deborah Brungard (IESG) Section: 7.2 Original Text ------------- The network node that advertised the Node Segment ID is responsible for generating a FEC Stack Change sub-TLV with the Post Office Protocol (POP) operation type for the Node Segment ID, regardless of whether or not Penultimate Hop Popping (PHP) is enabled. The network node that is immediately downstream of the node that advertised the Adjacency Segment ID is responsible for generating the FEC Stack Change sub-TLV for POP operation for the Adjacency Segment ID. Corrected Text -------------- The network node that advertised the Node Segment ID is responsible for generating a FEC Stack Change sub-TLV with the pop operation type for the Node Segment ID, regardless of whether or not penultimate hop popping (PHP) is enabled. The network node that is immediately downstream of the node that advertised the Adjacency Segment ID is responsible for generating the FEC Stack Change sub-TLV for pop operation for the Adjacency Segment ID. Notes ----- Expansion of POP to "Post Office Protocol" in the context of this document is wrong. It should not be capitalized, it is not an abbreviation, simply the verb, pop. In addition, expansion for PHP should not be with caps. -------------------------------------- RFC8287 (draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-13) -------------------------------------- Title : Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Traceroute for Segment Routing (SR) IGP-Prefix and IGP-Adjacency Segment Identifiers (SIDs) with MPLS Data Planes Publication Date : December 2017 Author(s) : N. Kumar, Ed., C. Pignataro, Ed., G. Swallow, N. Akiya, S. Kini, M. Chen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Multiprotocol Label Switching Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [mpls] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8287 … RFC Errata System