[mpls] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8287 (6101)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 30 April 2020 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77413A0DCF; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e-GK8UzcAnGH; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1831D3A0EBA; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3AFAAF40711; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: alexander.vainshtein@ecitele.com, naikumar@cisco.com, cpignata@cisco.com, swallow.ietf@gmail.com, nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com, sriganeshkini@gmail.com, mach.chen@huawei.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: db3546@att.com, iesg@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20200430182810.3AFAAF40711@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/zsdPBISIDkX9qOnJDZ8lcIs51as>
Subject: [mpls] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8287 (6101)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 18:28:30 -0000

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC8287, "Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Traceroute for Segment Routing (SR) IGP-Prefix and IGP-Adjacency Segment Identifiers (SIDs) with MPLS Data Planes". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6101

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Alexander ("Sasha") Vainshtein <alexander.vainshtein@ecitele.com>
Date Reported: 2020-04-13
Held by: Deborah Brungard (IESG)

Section: 7.2

Original Text
-------------
   The network node that advertised the Node Segment ID is responsible
   for generating a FEC Stack Change sub-TLV with the Post Office
   Protocol (POP) operation type for the Node Segment ID, regardless of
   whether or not Penultimate Hop Popping (PHP) is enabled.

   The network node that is immediately downstream of the node that
   advertised the Adjacency Segment ID is responsible for generating the
   FEC Stack Change sub-TLV for POP operation for the Adjacency Segment
   ID.

Corrected Text
--------------
   The network node that advertised the Node Segment ID is responsible
   for generating a FEC Stack Change sub-TLV with the pop operation type for 
   the Node Segment ID, regardless of whether or not penultimate hop popping 
   (PHP) is enabled.

   The network node that is immediately downstream of the node that
   advertised the Adjacency Segment ID is responsible for generating the
   FEC Stack Change sub-TLV for pop operation for the Adjacency Segment
   ID.

Notes
-----
Expansion of POP to "Post Office Protocol" in the context of this document is wrong. It should not be capitalized, it is not an abbreviation, simply the verb, pop. In addition, expansion for PHP should not be with caps.

--------------------------------------
RFC8287 (draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-13)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Traceroute for Segment Routing (SR) IGP-Prefix and IGP-Adjacency Segment Identifiers (SIDs) with MPLS Data Planes
Publication Date    : December 2017
Author(s)           : N. Kumar, Ed., C. Pignataro, Ed., G. Swallow, N. Akiya, S. Kini, M. Chen
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG