[mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair) roles - MPOWR WG proposal
sob@harvard.edu (Scott Bradner) Fri, 12 December 2003 22:21 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29619
for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:21:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AUveh-0003en-79
for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:21:03 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost)
by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBCML3WP014051
for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:21:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AUveh-0003eY-0g
for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:21:03 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29611
for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:20:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1AUvee-0002oF-00
for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:21:00 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org)
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AUvee-0002oC-00
for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:21:00 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1AUvef-0003dm-7U; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:21:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AUvdl-0003cr-05
for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:20:05 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29598
for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:20:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1AUvdi-0002nO-00
for mpowr@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:20:02 -0500
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu ([140.247.60.212]
helo=newdev.harvard.edu) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1AUvdi-0002mw-00
for mpowr@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:20:02 -0500
Received: by newdev.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501)
id AA5DAA2C5F; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:19:32 -0500 (EST)
To: Margaret.Wasserman@nokia.com, presnick@qualcomm.com, sob@harvard.edu
Cc: mpowr@ietf.org, solutions@alvestrand.no
In-Reply-To: <E320A8529CF07E4C967ECC2F380B0CF9027E4640@bsebe001.americas.nokia.com>
Message-Id: <20031212221932.AA5DAA2C5F@newdev.harvard.edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:19:32 -0500 (EST)
From: sob@harvard.edu (Scott Bradner)
Subject: [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair) roles - MPOWR WG
proposal
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>,
<mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>,
<mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
> I wasn't at the Thursday evening plenary, but the minutes > indicate that 60% of the people in the room thought that the > WG Chairs proposal was a good idea, 10% thought it was a=20 > bad idea and 10% didn't know. lets just say that I disagree with the idea that anywhere that % of the folks in the room expressed WG chairs proposal was a "good idea" - so far I have found almost no one who thought that the specific proposal was a good idea - only 2 or 3 people said they did at the mike - the rest expessed varing degrees of objection I do think that most people thought that talking about the issue was a good idea but let get some others say what they saw Scott _______________________________________________ mpowr mailing list mpowr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr
- [Mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Margaret.Wasserman
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Pete Resnick
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Margaret.Wasserman
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Ted Hardie
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Margaret.Wasserman
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… James Kempf
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Scott Bradner
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Scott Bradner
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Pete Resnick
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Henrik Levkowetz
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Melinda Shore
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Margaret.Wasserman
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… john.loughney
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… john.loughney
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Keith Moore
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… James Kempf
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Dave Crocker
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Dave Crocker
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Pete Resnick
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… James Kempf
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… Pete Resnick
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… James Kempf
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… Pete Resnick
- Quality Control and that nasty A word (was: Re: [… James Kempf
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… Steve Coya
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… Dave Crocker
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… Keith Moore
- Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word (was: R… Pete Resnick
- [mpowr] Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word (was: R… James Kempf
- [mpowr] Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word James Kempf
- Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word (was: R… James Kempf
- Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word (was: R… Dave Crocker
- [mpowr] Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word James Kempf
- Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control and that nasty A … Pekka Savola
- [mpowr] Troops versus superpower Alex Rousskov
- [mpowr] Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word Alex Conta
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… Alex Conta
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… David Meyer
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… Alex Rousskov
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… David Meyer
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… Alex Conta
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… Alex Rousskov
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… David Meyer
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… David Meyer
- Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word (was: R… Dave Crocker
- Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word (was: R… Dave Crocker
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Alex Conta
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… Alex Conta
- [mpowr] Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word Alex Conta