[mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower
"Robert Snively" <rsnively@Brocade.COM> Wed, 17 December 2003 21:30 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA06448
for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:30:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWjF7-0008Ip-9e
for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:30:05 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost)
by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBHLU5r7031902
for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:30:05 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWjF7-0008IO-03
for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:30:05 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA06417
for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:30:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1AWjF4-00039F-00
for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:30:03 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1AWjF3-00038w-00
for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:30:02 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org)
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AWjF2-00038t-00
for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:30:00 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1AWjF4-0008H2-77; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:30:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWjE5-0008FX-U0
for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:29:01 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA06381
for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:28:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1AWjE4-00037M-00
for mpowr@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:29:00 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1AWjE2-00037C-00
for mpowr@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:28:59 -0500
Received: from f070.brocade.com ([66.243.153.70] helo=blasphemy.brocade.com)
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AWjE2-00036K-00
for mpowr@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:28:58 -0500
Received: from hq-ex-3.corp.brocade.com (hq-ex-3 [192.168.38.35])
by blasphemy.brocade.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8131B1436D;
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:28:25 -0800 (PST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:28:25 -0800
Message-ID: <BA03B41AFFEA154B80DEB5BC9E4B65D0059179CC@hq-ex-3.corp.brocade.com>
Thread-Topic: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower
Thread-Index: AcPE4cSQsak4b0BCSNmeanQrm3BkcAAABDYQ
From: "Robert Snively" <rsnively@Brocade.COM>
To: "Alex Rousskov" <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Cc: "MPowr" <mpowr@ietf.org>, <solutions@alvestrand.no>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>,
<mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>,
<mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Since the procedural monitoring does not require the elevated technical knowledge of the technical review, the obvious organization to support it is the IETF Secretariat, perhaps organized as an association of the Internet Society. Parallels are found in IEEE (IEEE Standards Association) and ITIC (INCITS), as well as many other organizations sponsoring SDOs. Process management folks should probably be paid employees, not volunteers. They should receive direction principally from an appropriate policy board and report organizationally to a standards association tied to a sponsoring organization. The policy board may very well be IAB or IESG, but its responsibilities should be as directors, rather than as participants. See what I mean about this being a Big Picture problem? Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:rousskov@measurement-factory.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:07 PM > To: Robert Snively > Cc: MPowr; solutions@alvestrand.no > Subject: RE: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower > > > > On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Robert Snively wrote: > > > This third approach is also used by many SDOs. By maintaining > > absolute process supervision powers at a level equivalent to that of > > IESG, one could successfully disperse the technical review powers to > > a lower level (WG and below) during the development process and to a > > wide public during the superpower's process review period. > > I have been told by many IETF people who know better that IETF does > not have enough folks willing to do process management only, without > the technical work. Thus, I stopped advocating and noticing this > option; I assume it is impossible given existing resources. > > Alex. > _______________________________________________ > Solutions mailing list > Solutions@alvestrand.no > http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/solutions > > _______________________________________________ mpowr mailing list mpowr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower Robert Snively
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower Alex Rousskov
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower Robert Snively
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower Alex Conta
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower Alex Rousskov
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower Robert Snively
- [mpowr] process-only participation in WG [Troops … Pekka Savola
- [mpowr] Re: process-only participation in WG [Tro… Alex Conta
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Re: process-only particip… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [mpowr] Re: process-only participation in WG … James Kempf
- Re: [mpowr] Re: process-only participation in WG … Pekka Savola
- Re: [mpowr] Re: process-only participation in WG … Alex Conta
- Re: [mpowr] Re: process-only participation in WG … James Kempf
- Re: [mpowr] Re: process-only participation in WG … Alex Conta