IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair) roles - MPOWR WG proposal

Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Tue, 16 December 2003 16:36 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22598 for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:36:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWIB3-0001s0-Vd for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:36:06 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBGGa5EF007182 for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:36:05 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWIB3-0001rl-Q1 for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:36:05 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22553 for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:36:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AWIB2-0001YY-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:36:04 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AWIAz-0001Y0-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:36:04 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AWIAz-0001Xx-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:36:01 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWIAz-0001pM-US; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:36:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWHh8-00005o-AL for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:05:10 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA21455 for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:05:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AWHh5-0000K0-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:05:07 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AWHh4-0000Jt-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:05:07 -0500
Received: from klutz.cs.utk.edu ([160.36.56.50]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AWHh4-0000Jq-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:05:06 -0500
Received: from localhost (klutz.cs.utk.edu [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2789AAFB6F; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:05:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from klutz.cs.utk.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (klutz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24797-14; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:05:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from astro.cs.utk.edu (astro.cs.utk.edu [160.36.58.43]) by smtp.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FE8AFC90; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:05:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:05:04 -0500
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
Cc: moore@cs.utk.edu, "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>, MPowr <mpowr@ietf.org>, solutions@alvestrand.no
Subject: Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair) roles - MPOWR WG proposal
Message-Id: <20031216110504.08743892.moore@cs.utk.edu>
In-Reply-To: <p06100701bc03d25c61eb@[216.43.25.67]>
References: <20031209220238.172C19B30A@newdev.harvard.edu> <p06100601bbfd472cc28e@[216.43.25.67]> <028201c3c0fb$332bd220$666015ac@dclkempt40> <165181922.20031215084442@brandenburg.com> <030a01c3c330$cf260dd0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40> <p0610070cbc03a6fb3741@[216.43.25.67]> <041c01c3c34d$7050d6b0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40> <p06100701bc03d25c61eb@[216.43.25.67]>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386--netbsdelf)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and ClamAV at cs.utk.edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> >I disagree. I see nothing in 2026 or 2418 that gives a WG chair the 
> >authority to hold a document because they believe there are flaws in 
> >the design.
> 
> I don't know with whom you're disagreeing, because I never said that 
> and I don't believe that. I don't believe a WG chair has the 
> authority to hold a document because they believe there are flaws in 
> the design, nor do I believe that a chair should have such authority. 

that might be the case under our current rules.  however this has an 
interesting implication - that IESG is the only party that has the ability to block a document because of design flaws.

no wonder IESG has such a high workload!

_______________________________________________
mpowr mailing list
mpowr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email