[mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower
Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com> Wed, 17 December 2003 21:08 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA05349
for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:08:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWitn-0007dc-HF
for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:08:03 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost)
by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBHL83hp029354
for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:08:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWitn-0007dF-6j
for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:08:03 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA05338
for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:08:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1AWitl-0002DC-00
for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:08:01 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1AWitk-0002D5-00
for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:08:01 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org)
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AWitk-0002D2-00
for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:08:00 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1AWitl-0007c4-BL; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:08:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWit4-0007PC-G1
for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:07:18 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA05320
for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:07:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1AWit2-0002Bx-00
for mpowr@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:07:16 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1AWit2-0002Bq-00
for mpowr@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:07:16 -0500
Received: from measurement-factory.com ([206.168.0.5])
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AWit1-0002Bn-00
for mpowr@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:07:15 -0500
Received: from measurement-factory.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by measurement-factory.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBHL7Bk3018700;
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:07:11 -0700 (MST)
(envelope-from rousskov@measurement-factory.com)
Received: (from rousskov@localhost)
by measurement-factory.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hBHL7BWr018699;
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:07:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from rousskov)
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:07:11 -0700 (MST)
From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
To: Robert Snively <rsnively@Brocade.COM>
cc: solutions@alvestrand.no, MPowr <mpowr@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <BA03B41AFFEA154B80DEB5BC9E4B65D0059179CB@hq-ex-3.corp.brocade.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0312171403170.13687@measurement-factory.com>
References: <BA03B41AFFEA154B80DEB5BC9E4B65D0059179CB@hq-ex-3.corp.brocade.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>,
<mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>,
<mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Robert Snively wrote: > This third approach is also used by many SDOs. By maintaining > absolute process supervision powers at a level equivalent to that of > IESG, one could successfully disperse the technical review powers to > a lower level (WG and below) during the development process and to a > wide public during the superpower's process review period. I have been told by many IETF people who know better that IETF does not have enough folks willing to do process management only, without the technical work. Thus, I stopped advocating and noticing this option; I assume it is impossible given existing resources. Alex. _______________________________________________ mpowr mailing list mpowr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower Robert Snively
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower Alex Rousskov
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower Robert Snively
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower Alex Conta
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower Alex Rousskov
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower Robert Snively
- [mpowr] process-only participation in WG [Troops … Pekka Savola
- [mpowr] Re: process-only participation in WG [Tro… Alex Conta
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Re: process-only particip… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [mpowr] Re: process-only participation in WG … James Kempf
- Re: [mpowr] Re: process-only participation in WG … Pekka Savola
- Re: [mpowr] Re: process-only participation in WG … Alex Conta
- Re: [mpowr] Re: process-only participation in WG … James Kempf
- Re: [mpowr] Re: process-only participation in WG … Alex Conta