[mpowr] Summary of Discussion on Reforming IETF Quality Control Process
"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Sat, 10 January 2004 00:46 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA02158
for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:46:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Af7GM-0000fV-49
for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:46:02 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost)
by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0A0k2w2002563
for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:46:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Af7GL-0000fG-VT
for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:46:02 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA02141
for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:45:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1Af7GK-00010A-00
for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:46:00 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1Af7Ea-0000vM-00
for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:44:12 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org)
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Af7DQ-0000pH-00
for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:43:00 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1Af7DR-0000ZO-CS; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:43:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Af7Cc-0000Y4-20
for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:42:10 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA02013
for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:42:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1Af7Ca-0000nj-00
for mpowr@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:42:08 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1Af7Aj-0000iG-00
for mpowr@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:40:14 -0500
Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com
([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser)
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1Af7AA-0000by-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:39:38 -0500
Message-ID: <029201c3d712$48293870$606015ac@dclkempt40>
From: "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: <solutions@alvestrand.no>, "MPowr" <mpowr@ietf.org>, <icar@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:40:01 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [mpowr] Summary of Discussion on Reforming IETF Quality Control
Process
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>,
<mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>,
<mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I've written a draft summarizing the discussions on reforming the IETF quality control process that started on mpowr in December and wandered to solutions in January. It's here: http://www.geocities.com/kempf42/draft-list-quality-control-00.txt I am not exactly sure what to do with the draft at this point, but would be interested in hearing feedback. There has been a preference expressed for discussing the issue on solutions rather than on either mpowr or icar, but I'm on all three lists and I'll try to respond as time allows. I'd also be interested in hearing suggestions about how to proceed. If this doesn't look like a valuable activity, we should apply the procedure described in the draft and terminate it early. :-) jak _______________________________________________ mpowr mailing list mpowr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr
- [mpowr] Summary of Discussion on Reforming IETF Q… James Kempf
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Summary of Discussion on … Margaret Wasserman
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Summary of Discussion on … James Kempf
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Summary of Discussion on … Alex Rousskov
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Summary of Discussion on … Joel M. Halpern