[mpowr] Increasing WG chair role in RFC-editor editing process?
Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Sun, 29 February 2004 06:51 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA25461 for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:51:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AxKmf-0003aq-Mt for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:50:41 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1T6ofFj013805 for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:50:41 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AxKmf-0003aa-FQ for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:50:41 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA25446 for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:50:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AxKmc-00041c-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:50:38 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AxKlg-0003ww-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:49:41 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AxKl0-0003sO-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:48:58 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AxKl2-0003Yq-WF; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:49:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AxKkj-0003YA-Tt for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:48:42 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA25369 for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:48:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AxKkg-0003rO-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:48:38 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AxKjq-0003mY-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:47:46 -0500
Received: from netcore.fi ([193.94.160.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AxKj2-0003aD-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:46:56 -0500
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1T6kQn14163; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 08:46:26 +0200
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 08:46:26 +0200
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: mpowr@ietf.org
cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402290840490.14075-100000@netcore.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject: [mpowr] Increasing WG chair role in RFC-editor editing process?
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Hi, This little practicality has hit me as WG chair a couple of times, so.. perhas this is just a matter of RFC editor changing its process, but if not, this should be another tiny improvement in the process. When a document which is product of a WG is being edited by the RFC editor, any questions/issues/etc. are addressed to the document authors and the shepherding AD. My argument is that this list should be the document authors (or editor, whatever's the case), WG chairs, and the shepherding AD. The AD's job would be just to ensure that WG chairs don't get out of hand.. and the final check & balance would be at AUTH48, AD approving that the document hasn't been substantially modified. This kind of slight "power raise" helps in the scenario where the document authors have gone dormant, and are not responding to their mails in {days, weeks, months, never}. Currently either the AD has to take care of these issues, or act as an SMTP relay between the RFC editor and the chairs. Would make sense? -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings _______________________________________________ mpowr mailing list mpowr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr
- [mpowr] Increasing WG chair role in RFC-editor ed… Pekka Savola
- Re: [mpowr] Increasing WG chair role in RFC-edito… David Meyer