[mpowr] RE: [Solutions] General Area meeting in Seoul

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Fri, 13 February 2004 17:37 UTC

Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:22:17 -0800
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, solutions@alvestrand.no, mpowr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <265526627.1076664137@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F056B25FD@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
References: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F056B25FD@is0004avexu1.global.av aya.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] General Area meeting in Seoul
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--On 13. februar 2004 18:21 +0200 "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" 
<dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:

> Harald,
>
> Taking into account the level of general interest that this discussion
> may arise, would not a plenary be a better scheduling spot, rather than a
> WG meeting spot, in conflict with other WG meetings?

When I compared the insight gathered from the discussion at the plenary 
with the insight gathered from the discussion at the NEWTRK BOF in 
Minneapolis, I came to the opposite conclusion.

YMMV - but I think a smaller forum may be beneficial to getting focused 
discussion on the issues.
They will all go back to the mailing lists, I-D publication process and 
Last Call mechanisms, of course.

                     Harald

_______________________________________________
mpowr mailing list
mpowr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr

[mpowr] General Area meeting in Seoul Harald Tveit Alvestrand
[mpowr] RE: [Solutions] General Area meeting in S… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
[mpowr] RE: [Solutions] General Area meeting in S… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
[mpowr] RE: [Solutions] General Area meeting in S… john.loughney