Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair) roles - MPOWR WG proposal

Alex Conta <aconta@txc.com> Thu, 18 December 2003 03:14 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA19925 for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:14:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWoc4-0003GK-I7 for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:14:09 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBI3E8HK012536 for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:14:08 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWoc2-0003Dv-Ay for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:14:06 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA19896 for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:14:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AWoby-0005uU-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:14:03 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AWobv-0005to-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:14:02 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AWobv-0005th-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:13:59 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWobx-0003Bq-CI; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:14:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWOmc-0004n4-2c for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:39:18 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA14833 for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:39:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AWOmZ-0002Vq-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:39:15 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AWOmY-0002Vj-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:39:14 -0500
Received: from transfire.txc.com ([208.5.237.254] helo=pguin2.txc.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AWOmX-0002Vf-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:39:13 -0500
Received: from txc.com ([172.17.0.134]) by pguin2.txc.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id hBGNd7028005; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:39:07 -0500
Message-ID: <3FDF979A.2000907@txc.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:39:06 -0500
From: Alex Conta <aconta@txc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
CC: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>, MPowr <mpowr@ietf.org>, solutions@alvestrand.no
Subject: Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair) roles - MPOWR WG proposal
References: <20031209220238.172C19B30A@newdev.harvard.edu> <p06100601bbfd472cc28e@[216.43.25.67]> <028201c3c0fb$332bd220$666015ac@dclkempt40> <165181922.20031215084442@brandenburg.com> <030a01c3c330$cf260dd0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40> <p0610070cbc03a6fb3741@[216.43.25.67]> <041c01c3c34d$7050d6b0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40>
In-Reply-To: <041c01c3c34d$7050d6b0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000606090505060107030508"
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60

Please see in line

James Kempf wrote:

> Pete,
> 
> 
> I agree with Margaret's basic contention: the WG chairs need the authority
> to be able to hold specs because, in their design judgement, the spec is
> flawed. 
 > [...]

How is this fairness and impartiality supposed to work in case the WG 
chair is an author or co-author of a competing spec? Would a chair ever 
block a document he is author or co-author of?

I've seen enough in the last 10 years or so in IETF to say that in 
current conditions, I think this very basic contention is wrong.

Alex