IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair) roles - MPOWR WG proposal

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Fri, 12 December 2003 22:38 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA00414 for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:38:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AUvvH-0004Y9-0k for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:38:11 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBCMcAnA017481 for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:38:10 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AUvvF-0004Xd-Gd for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:38:09 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA00375 for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:38:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AUvvD-0003F4-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:38:07 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AUvvC-0003F1-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:38:06 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AUvvD-0004Wt-LE; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:38:07 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AUvnn-0003sX-1t for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:30:27 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29867 for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:30:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AUvnk-0002yn-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:30:24 -0500
Received: from h195n1fls311o871.telia.com ([213.64.174.195] helo=chardonnay) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AUvnk-0002yk-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:30:24 -0500
Received: from chardonnay ([127.0.0.1]) by chardonnay with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AUvnc-0000KU-00; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:30:16 +0100
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:30:09 +0100
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
To: sob@harvard.edu (Scott Bradner)
Cc: Margaret.Wasserman@nokia.com, presnick@qualcomm.com, sob@harvard.edu, mpowr@ietf.org, solutions@alvestrand.no
Message-Id: <20031212233009.5c0775e3.henrik@levkowetz.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031212220744.60050A2BE4@newdev.harvard.edu>
References: <E320A8529CF07E4C967ECC2F380B0CF9027E463F@bsebe001.americas.nokia.com> <20031212220744.60050A2BE4@newdev.harvard.edu>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair) roles - MPOWR WG proposal
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Friday 12 December 2003, Scott wrote:
> > But, based on the results
> > of the plenary poll, there did seem to be significant support for=20
> > the IESG's proposal to move more authority and responsibility to WG=20
> > chairs.
> 
> I disagree with this conclusion
> 
> I did not see such a consensus nor did I hear any hint of such a consensus
> in talking to people during the meeting

I agree with Margaret's statement. I looked around when the poll was
taken, and there seemed to be significant support for the IESG's
proposal.

There's been a few voices opposing this very loudly on the solutions
and problem-statemen lists, but most people I've been in contact with
have - on being asked about their position on this - indicated support.

The impression I get is that many people support this, a few oppose it,
but are much more vociferous.

	Henrik

_______________________________________________
mpowr mailing list
mpowr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email