IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair) roles - MPOWR WG proposal

Margaret.Wasserman@nokia.com Fri, 12 December 2003 22:16 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29480 for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:16:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AUvZV-0003On-MA for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:15:41 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBCMFftv013054 for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:15:41 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AUvZV-0003OO-8j for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:15:41 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29444 for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:15:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AUvZS-0002gA-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:15:38 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AUvZB-0002fo-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:15:21 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AUvYt-0003My-8v; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:15:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AUvY9-0003Lt-E8 for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:14:17 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29392 for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:14:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Margaret.Wasserman@nokia.com
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AUvY7-0002eh-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:14:15 -0500
Received: from mgw-x4.nokia.com ([131.228.20.27]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AUvY6-0002ee-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:14:14 -0500
Received: from esvir03nok.nokia.com (esvir03nokt.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.35]) by mgw-x4.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id hBCMEEH29333 for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 00:14:14 +0200 (EET)
Received: from daebh001.NOE.Nokia.com (unverified) by esvir03nok.nokia.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.5) with ESMTP id <T667957b01aac158f23077@esvir03nok.nokia.com>; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 00:14:14 +0200
Received: from bsebe001.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.19.160.13]) by daebh001.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6747); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:14:06 -0800
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:14:05 -0500
Message-ID: <E320A8529CF07E4C967ECC2F380B0CF9027E4640@bsebe001.americas.nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair) roles - MPOWR WG proposal
Thread-Index: AcPA/GMALUtHauqwSFaY6rAcdLOkowAAAymQ
To: <sob@harvard.edu>, <presnick@qualcomm.com>
Cc: <mpowr@ietf.org>, <solutions@alvestrand.no>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Dec 2003 22:14:06.0806 (UTC) FILETIME=[424C4760:01C3C0FD]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair) roles - MPOWR WG proposal
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Scott,

> > But, based on the results of the plenary poll, there did seem 
> > to be significant support for the IESG's proposal to move more 
> > authority and responsibility to WG chairs.
> 
> I disagree with this conclusion
> 
> I did not see such a consensus nor did I hear any hint of 
> such a consensus in talking to people during the meeting

I think that you are disagreeing with a statement that I didn't
make.  I did not say that there was consensus.  In fact, my
previous sentence indicated that the concept of consensus on
such a vague concept would be meaningless...  And, beside, it
isn't my perogative to define consensus within the IETF.

I wasn't at the Thursday evening plenary, but the minutes
indicate that 60% of the people in the room thought that the
WG Chairs proposal was a good idea, 10% thought it was a 
bad idea and 10% didn't know.  The other 20% of the people
in the room didn't respond, I guess.  

I consider 60% of the people at the plenary to be "significant
support".  YMMV.

Margaret



_______________________________________________
mpowr mailing list
mpowr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email