IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpowr] Re: process-only participation in WG [Troops vs superpower]

"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Thu, 18 December 2003 19:05 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA09180 for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:05:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AX3SK-0002C4-RT for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:05:04 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBIJ54DN008426 for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:05:04 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AX3SK-0002Bp-Lc for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:05:04 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA09153 for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:05:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AX3SI-00028H-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:05:02 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AX3SH-00028A-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:05:02 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AX3SH-000287-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:05:01 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AX3SH-0002Ap-No; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:05:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AX3S9-0002AT-7j for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:04:53 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA09141 for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:04:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AX3S6-00027e-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:04:50 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AX3S6-00027X-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:04:50 -0500
Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AX3S5-00027U-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:04:49 -0500
Message-ID: <022001c3c599$dc841e20$5b6015ac@dclkempt40>
From: "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: "Alex Conta" <aconta@txc.com>
Cc: "Pekka Savola" <pekkas@netcore.fi>, "MPowr" <mpowr@ietf.org>, <solutions@alvestrand.no>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312180946500.12194-100000@netcore.fi> <3FE1CADA.6090305@txc.com> <015401c3c585$7fa0c230$5b6015ac@dclkempt40> <3FE1F45A.2030004@txc.com>
Subject: Re: [mpowr] Re: process-only participation in WG [Troops vs superpower]
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:05:09 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Standardization has some radical differences.  An important one is that
> work is being done by many people/companies of diverse, and/or
> conflicting, and/or competing, backgrounds, interests, and ideas. The
> importance of impartiality and equal access is proportional with the
> number of people, and their diversity.   Another different aspect is the
> reward - being a document author is the immediate personal reward, in
> which impartiality and equal access are important.
>

Yes, this gets to the point of "tussles" in the Internet, very well
articulated in:

 Clark, D.D., Wroclawski, J., Sollins, K., and Braden, B., "Tussle in
 Cyberspace: Defining Tommorow's Internet", Proceedings of Sigcomm 2002.

and discussed somewhat in draft-iab-e2e-futures, a recent IAB draft.

            jak


_______________________________________________
mpowr mailing list
mpowr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email