IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpowr] Mailing List Management

Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com> Tue, 23 December 2003 21:17 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA11997 for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:17:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYttW-0001ep-2P for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:16:46 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBNLGkFk006365 for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:16:46 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYttV-0001ea-Un for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:16:45 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA11814 for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:16:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYttU-0005SS-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:16:44 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AYtqa-0004nY-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:13:45 -0500
Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYtmf-00044d-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:09:41 -0500
Received: from optimus22.ietf.org ([132.151.6.22] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AYtm5-000270-FH for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:09:40 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYtm0-0001Do-Lr; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:09:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYtld-0001DZ-7e for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:08:37 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA10211 for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:08:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYtlb-0003ud-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:08:35 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AYtis-0003PE-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:05:47 -0500
Received: from measurement-factory.com ([206.168.0.5]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYtgF-000321-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:03:04 -0500
Received: from measurement-factory.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by measurement-factory.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBNL2xk3061189; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:02:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from rousskov@measurement-factory.com)
Received: (from rousskov@localhost) by measurement-factory.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hBNL2x5e061188; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:02:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from rousskov)
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:02:59 -0700 (MST)
From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
To: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
cc: MPowr <mpowr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpowr] Mailing List Management
In-Reply-To: <2d7d01c3c987$cfa411f0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0312231353320.47938@measurement-factory.com>
References: <011901c3c654$24fdc830$5b6015ac@dclkempt40> <383969298.1071956717@localhost> <3FE86D59.8060201@txc.com> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0312230933510.47938@measurement-factory.com> <2ca901c3c97b$347b1db0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0312231037030.47938@measurement-factory.com> <2ccf01c3c97d$b5993ec0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0312231117340.47938@measurement-factory.com> <2d7d01c3c987$cfa411f0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60

Quick question: While X's e-mails are blocked without a formal last
warning, can the WG decide on anything of value? For example, can the
WG decide on submitting the current draft as proposed standard? Or
accepting an individual draft as a WG work item?

If yes, then this would be a convenient way for the Chair's party to
win consensus on the issue (by silencing a few people who oppose the
decision). Surely, their posting "privileges"  will be restored a week
later, but it would take _another_ appeal to overrule any WG decisions
made during that week. Would it not?

Alex.

_______________________________________________
mpowr mailing list
mpowr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email