Re: [mpowr] Mailing List Management

Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com> Tue, 23 December 2003 17:47 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA28595 for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:47:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYqca-0000VZ-IN for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:47:04 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBNHl4Bp001947 for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:47:04 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYqca-0000VK-9W for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:47:04 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA28581 for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:46:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYqcX-0006iC-01 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:47:02 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AYqYe-0006e8-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:43:03 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYqYe-0006dy-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:43:00 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYqYf-0000QO-5y; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:43:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYqYZ-0000PO-BV for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:42:55 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA28430 for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:42:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYqYX-0006cN-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:42:53 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AYqYG-0006bp-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:42:36 -0500
Received: from measurement-factory.com ([206.168.0.5]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYqYF-0006bm-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:42:35 -0500
Received: from measurement-factory.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by measurement-factory.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBNHgSk3052213; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:42:28 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from rousskov@measurement-factory.com)
Received: (from rousskov@localhost) by measurement-factory.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hBNHgSm7052212; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:42:28 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from rousskov)
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:42:28 -0700 (MST)
From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
To: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
cc: MPowr <mpowr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpowr] Mailing List Management
In-Reply-To: <2ca901c3c97b$347b1db0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0312231037030.47938@measurement-factory.com>
References: <011901c3c654$24fdc830$5b6015ac@dclkempt40> <383969298.1071956717@localhost> <3FE86D59.8060201@txc.com> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0312230933510.47938@measurement-factory.com> <2ca901c3c97b$347b1db0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, James Kempf wrote:

> I've had experience with disruptive participants on mailing lists, and the
> answer is, no it would not help.
>
> The problem is that when a disruptor appears, the good technical people tend
> to leave.

Could the good technical people be quickly advised by more experienced
IETFers (e.g., the Chair) to setup a simple filter? Sure, some e-mails
will still get through, but if the good technical people care enough
about the WG work, it seems like a small price to pay to stay involved
in that work.

Alex.

_______________________________________________
mpowr mailing list
mpowr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr