[mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Troops versus superpower

[Alex Conta <[e-mail]>]

Alex,

Alex Rousskov wrote:

> On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Robert Snively wrote:
> 
> 
>>This third approach is also used by many SDOs. By maintaining
>>absolute process supervision powers at a level equivalent to that of
>>IESG, one could successfully disperse the technical review powers to
>>a lower level (WG and below) during the development process and to a
>>wide public during the superpower's process review period.
> 
> 
> I have been told by many IETF people who know better that IETF does
> not have enough folks willing to do process management only, without
> the technical work.  Thus, I stopped advocating and noticing this
> option; I assume it is impossible given existing resources.
> 
> Alex.

You say you've been told "IETF does not have enough folks willing to do 
process management only, without the technical work".

I believe that.

But a separation of process management from technical work, in case of N 
WGs in IETF, will allow X to chair WG A, and do technical work in as 
many WGs as X wants except A, which is N-1 WGs.

So I do not see why you stopped?  Individual X can do both process 
management and technical work.

Regards,
Alex C.