[mpowr] Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word
"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Tue, 16 December 2003 18:06 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA25904
for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:06:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWJa6-0005od-HU
for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:06:02 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost)
by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBGI62Ic022349
for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:06:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWJa6-0005oO-Bq
for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:06:02 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA25880
for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:05:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1AWJa4-0004Yr-00
for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:06:00 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1AWJa3-0004Yj-00
for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:06:00 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org)
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AWJa3-0004Yg-00
for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:05:59 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1AWJa4-0005nP-L6; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:06:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AWJZU-0005kl-7Y
for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:05:24 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA25853
for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:05:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 1AWJZS-0004X2-00
for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:05:22 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
id 1AWJZR-0004Wv-00
for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:05:22 -0500
Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com
([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser)
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AWJZR-0004Wr-00
for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:05:21 -0500
Message-ID: <01cd01c3c3ff$3780ca90$5b6015ac@dclkempt40>
From: "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: "Lucy E. Lynch" <llynch@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
Cc: "MPowr" <mpowr@ietf.org>, <solutions@alvestrand.no>
References: <20031209220238.172C19B30A@newdev.harvard.edu>
<p06100601bbfd472cc28e@[216.43.25.67]>
<028201c3c0fb$332bd220$666015ac@dclkempt40>
<165181922.20031215084442@brandenburg.com>
<030a01c3c330$cf260dd0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40>
<p0610070cbc03a6fb3741@[216.43.25.67]>
<041c01c3c34d$7050d6b0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40>
<209066081.20031215141412@brandenburg.com>
<04ac01c3c363$48b42510$5b6015ac@dclkempt40>
<p06100707bc041a2434e6@[216.43.25.67]>
<004e01c3c3f1$af209a70$5b6015ac@dclkempt40>
<Pine.GSO.4.58.0312160951240.23628@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:05:41 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>,
<mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>,
<mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
If you'd rather call it "relevance" than "X-stuff" be my guest.
jak
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lucy E. Lynch" <llynch@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
To: "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
Cc: "MPowr" <mpowr@ietf.org>rg>; <solutions@alvestrand.no>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word
>
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, James Kempf wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I disagree. No sane person is going to take the responsibility to
do
> > something without the authority to get it done. One argument some have
made
> > against giving the WG chairs more X stuff is that we don't get very good
> > people as WG chairs. If they aren't given the X stuff to match their
> > responsibility, we'll get even worse.
> >
> > jak
>
> Excuse the cross post - but I thought Vixie's take on Authority
> might be interesting to folks - seems pretty sane to me.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: 16 Dec 2003 07:14:57 +0000
> From: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Root Authority
>
>
> > An interesting question I've dealt with a few times:
> >
> > From whom do the root nameservers derive their authority?
>
> we (i'm speaking for f-root here) have no "authority". nobody has to
> listen to us, we are the most powerless bunch of folks you'll ever meet.
>
> now if you'd asked where we derive our *relevance*, i'd say the same as
> mr. bush and mr. kletnieks -- from all the root.cache files that point
> at us. and as long as we don't do anything stupid i guess (and hope)
> that this state of affairs will continue. (relevance trumps authority.)
>
> that having been said, f-root got its start as NS.ISC.ORG and the man
> who said it was ok for us to be a root name server was jon postel. i'm
> not sure he had any "authority" either, but folks "pointed at" him and
> so what he said was relevant in spite of any authority he mightn've had.
> --
> Paul Vixie
>
_______________________________________________
mpowr mailing list
mpowr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr
- [Mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Margaret.Wasserman
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Pete Resnick
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Margaret.Wasserman
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Ted Hardie
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Margaret.Wasserman
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… James Kempf
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Scott Bradner
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Scott Bradner
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Pete Resnick
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Henrik Levkowetz
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Melinda Shore
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Margaret.Wasserman
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… john.loughney
- [mpowr] RE: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… john.loughney
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Keith Moore
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… James Kempf
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Dave Crocker
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Dave Crocker
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Pete Resnick
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… James Kempf
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… Pete Resnick
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… James Kempf
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… Pete Resnick
- Quality Control and that nasty A word (was: Re: [… James Kempf
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… Steve Coya
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… Dave Crocker
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… Keith Moore
- Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word (was: R… Pete Resnick
- [mpowr] Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word (was: R… James Kempf
- [mpowr] Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word James Kempf
- Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word (was: R… James Kempf
- Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word (was: R… Dave Crocker
- [mpowr] Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word James Kempf
- Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control and that nasty A … Pekka Savola
- [mpowr] Troops versus superpower Alex Rousskov
- [mpowr] Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word Alex Conta
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… Alex Conta
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… David Meyer
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… Alex Rousskov
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… David Meyer
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… Alex Conta
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… Alex Rousskov
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… David Meyer
- Re: [Solutions] Re: [mpowr] Re: Quality Control a… David Meyer
- Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word (was: R… Dave Crocker
- Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word (was: R… Dave Crocker
- [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (chair… Alex Conta
- Re: [mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Further work on WG (c… Alex Conta
- [mpowr] Re: Quality Control and that nasty A word Alex Conta