Re: [mpowr] Mailing List Management

Alex,

I have dealt with at least one environment where the level of disruptive 
participants was far higher than most IETF lists.

One of the things that was actively mentioned was that a banned participant 
could get other people to forward their argument while they were banned, if 
they had one they considered important.

None ever did.

                 Harald

--On 23. desember 2003 14:02 -0700 Alex Rousskov 
<rousskov@measurement-factory.com> wrote:

>
> Quick question: While X's e-mails are blocked without a formal last
> warning, can the WG decide on anything of value? For example, can the
> WG decide on submitting the current draft as proposed standard? Or
> accepting an individual draft as a WG work item?
>
> If yes, then this would be a convenient way for the Chair's party to
> win consensus on the issue (by silencing a few people who oppose the
> decision). Surely, their posting "privileges"  will be restored a week
> later, but it would take _another_ appeal to overrule any WG decisions
> made during that week. Would it not?
>
> Alex.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpowr mailing list
> mpowr@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr
>
>

_______________________________________________
mpowr mailing list
mpowr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr