Re: [mpowr] Mailing List Management

Alex Conta <aconta@txc.com> Tue, 23 December 2003 17:23 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA27995 for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:23:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYqFO-0008IZ-1C for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:23:06 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBNHN5Gd031893 for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:23:06 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYqFN-0008IK-Ki for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:23:05 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA27979 for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:23:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYqFM-0005zo-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:23:04 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AYqBQ-0005vs-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:19:06 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYqBQ-0005vg-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:19:00 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYqBQ-0008Bt-R0; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:19:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYqBK-0008BM-EA for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:18:54 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA27859 for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:18:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYqBI-0005u8-01 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:18:52 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AYqAM-0005ts-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:17:56 -0500
Received: from transfire.txc.com ([208.5.237.254] helo=pguin2.txc.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYqAM-0005to-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:17:54 -0500
Received: from txc.com ([172.18.253.131]) by pguin2.txc.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id hBNHHo014202; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:17:50 -0500
Message-ID: <3FE878B7.7080803@txc.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:17:43 -0500
From: Alex Conta <aconta@txc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
CC: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, MPowr <mpowr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpowr] Mailing List Management
References: <011901c3c654$24fdc830$5b6015ac@dclkempt40> <383969298.1071956717@localhost> <11225820.1072112513@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <11225820.1072112513@localhost>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms010507050206010808040603"
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,REMOVE_IN_QUOTES autolearn=no version=2.60

John C Klensin wrote:

> --On Saturday, December 20, 2003 21:45 -0800 Harald Tveit
> Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> 
> 
>>in my opinion Alex Conta and Scott Bradner are wrong.
>> [...]
> 
> Two additions to Harald's comments...
> 
> [...] Should
> someone ejected from a list have the right to get (via appeal or
> otherwise), a quick review and response from the AD?  Yes, and I
> hope that doesn't require a rule (see below). 

There is an inherent contradiction between a well thought appeal 
decision, and quick. Today ADs/IESG do not act quickly on WG chairs 
requests of "remove" - "quick" will be the incentive to simply approve 
the decision of the chairs.

>[...] No, I don't think so, partially
> because, if something really needs immediate action 
 > [...]

I fail to understand or see the cases in which there is need for 
"immediate action". I would appreciate if one would describe it.

> But a WG
> Chair who pushes someone off a mailing list --or takes any of
> several other actions I think a WG Chair should be able to take
> on his or her own-- ought to expect to get fired if the AD later
> concludes that the judgments involved were excessively bad.
> 

Can you remind of any fired WG chair? I do not remember any, and I 
certainly do not expect a chair not being able to justify an abusive 
action within the boundaries of its powers.

> [...]Two final coments, lest I be accused about writing too-short
> notes :-(
> 

I worked hard to make it shorter :-)...

>  [...]  Down through the
> centuries, people and organizations have always discovered that
> open, everyone-talks-at-once, assemblies are a lousy way of
> getting anything done and, as a result, figured out some
> "leadership" selection mechanism. 
> [...] 
>       john
> 
> 

complemented by some checks and balances mechanisms, which the current 
mailing list remove rule I think is.

Alex
> _______________________________________________
> mpowr mailing list
> mpowr@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr
> 
>