Re: [mpowr] Attagirl on draft-wasserman-rfc2418-ml-update-00.txt, and a couple of corner cases...

Dear Harald,

Ah, thank you for the pointer.

I think I still have a similar question about anything like
http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/solutions, which started
out as "not an official IETF activity" but now seems to be at least a
little bit more official - if it's "intended for general discussion of
IETF process changes to deal with the issues documented by the IETF
"problem" WG", I would think that the General AD would be the likely
person to suspend posting privileges.

And I think someone should be able to suspend posting privileges if
necessary for mailing lists like Solutions.

Does it seem so to you?

Thanks,

Spencer

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>; <mpowr@ietf.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 8:00 AM
Subject: Re: [mpowr] Attagirl on
draft-wasserman-rfc2418-ml-update-00.txt, and a couple of corner
cases...

>
>
> --On 6. mars 2004 10:09 +0900 Spencer Dawkins
<spencer@mcsr-labs.org> wrote:
>
> > - I'm really confused about what applies to ietf@ietf.org, since
> > there's only one General Area Director.
>
> ietf@ietf.org has its own set of rules - RFC 3005. I think the
answer here
> should be approximately the same as for IETF non-WG mailing lists
(whatever
> that answer is), but until the draft says that it wants to update
RFC 3005,
> I'm happy to leave ietf@ietf.org alone!
>
>                   Harald
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpowr mailing list
> mpowr@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr

_______________________________________________
mpowr mailing list
mpowr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr