IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpowr] Mailing List Management

"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Tue, 23 December 2003 21:26 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA13030 for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:26:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYu2o-00027F-FM for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:26:22 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBNLQM4l008127 for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:26:22 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYu2o-000270-B2 for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:26:22 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA12877 for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:26:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYu2m-0006OH-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:26:20 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AYu0h-00066I-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:24:11 -0500
Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYtyl-0005xz-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:22:11 -0500
Received: from optimus22.ietf.org ([132.151.6.22] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AYtuj-0002Od-Ce for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:18:01 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYtui-0001lI-Ea; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:18:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AYtuV-0001kh-0i for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:17:47 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA12162 for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:17:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYtuT-0005d1-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:17:45 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AYtsU-0005D6-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:15:43 -0500
Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AYtp2-0004V5-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:12:08 -0500
Message-ID: <2ed401c3c999$7a806540$5b6015ac@dclkempt40>
From: "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: "Alex Rousskov" <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Cc: "MPowr" <mpowr@ietf.org>
References: <011901c3c654$24fdc830$5b6015ac@dclkempt40> <383969298.1071956717@localhost> <3FE86D59.8060201@txc.com> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0312230933510.47938@measurement-factory.com> <2ca901c3c97b$347b1db0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0312231037030.47938@measurement-factory.com> <2ccf01c3c97d$b5993ec0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0312231117340.47938@measurement-factory.com> <2d7d01c3c987$cfa411f0$5b6015ac@dclkempt40> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0312231353320.47938@measurement-factory.com>
Subject: Re: [mpowr] Mailing List Management
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:12:31 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

AlexR,

Like I said in previous email, there is always the possibility for the WG
chairs and AD to make an error in judgement. Presumably, if the AD is
maintaining good management oversight, the probability of this happening is
low. If it does happen, appeals are always possible. In a situation like you
outline, I'd presume the party involved would appeal.

            jak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alex Rousskov" <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
To: "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
Cc: "MPowr" <mpowr@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: [mpowr] Mailing List Management


>
> Quick question: While X's e-mails are blocked without a formal last
> warning, can the WG decide on anything of value? For example, can the
> WG decide on submitting the current draft as proposed standard? Or
> accepting an individual draft as a WG work item?
>
> If yes, then this would be a convenient way for the Chair's party to
> win consensus on the issue (by silencing a few people who oppose the
> decision). Surely, their posting "privileges"  will be restored a week
> later, but it would take _another_ appeal to overrule any WG decisions
> made during that week. Would it not?
>
> Alex.
>


_______________________________________________
mpowr mailing list
mpowr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email