[mpowr] Re: [Solutions] Summary of Discussion on Reforming IETF Quality Control Process

Hi James,

I just read your proposal.  Thanks for posting it.

Although I may have more detailed questions later, I have a
couple of quick clarification questions now...

What are the criteria for deciding whether a particular document
requires full IESG review?  And, when would this be decided -- at
charter time, when the document is accepted as a WG item, during
WG Last Call, when the shepherding AD reviews the status of the
document, or at some other time?

In dispute resolution, you seem to indicate that the shepherding
AD will take all disputes to the full IESG.  Currently, the
shepherding AD (or two ADs in an area) make an attempt to resolve
any dispute before it is brought to the full IESG.  Is it your
intention to change that?

Do you have any sort of transition plan for how we could move
to this approach?  Are there useful experiments that we could
run to see if it would work?

Margaret

At 04:40 PM 1/9/2004 -0800, James Kempf wrote:
>I've written a draft summarizing the discussions on reforming the IETF
>quality control process that started on mpowr in December and wandered to
>solutions in January. It's here:
>
>http://www.geocities.com/kempf42/draft-list-quality-control-00.txt
>
>I am not exactly sure what to do with the draft at this point, but would be
>interested in hearing feedback. There has been a preference expressed for
>discussing the issue on solutions rather than on either mpowr or icar, but
>I'm on all three lists and I'll try to respond as time allows. I'd also be
>interested in hearing suggestions about how to proceed. If this doesn't look
>like a valuable activity, we should apply the procedure described in the
>draft and terminate it early. :-)
>
>             jak
>
>_______________________________________________
>Solutions mailing list
>Solutions@alvestrand.no
>http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/solutions

_______________________________________________
mpowr mailing list
mpowr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr