followup on ambiguity in rfc1759

Joel Gyllenskog <jgyllens@hpbs3125.boi.hp.com> Tue, 09 May 1995 17:44 UTC

Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Joel Gyllenskog <jgyllens@hpbs3125.boi.hp.com>
Message-Id: <9505091744.AA25019@hpbs3125.boi.hp.com>
Subject: followup on ambiguity in rfc1759
To: dck2-iesg@mail.bellcore.com
Date: Tue, 09 May 1995 11:44:04 -0600
Cc: case@snmp.com, waldbusser@ins.com, pmi@hpbs987.boi.hp.com
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]

To:    Deirdre Kostick, IESG management area director
CC:    Jeff Case, who suggested that I contact you
       Steve Waldbusser, technical advisor to printer working group
       Members of the printer working group
From:  Joel Gyllenskog, chair of the printer working group
Re:    Follow up on request of May 3 for help with ambiguity in rfc1759

Deirdre,

It has been nearly a week since I sent a message asking for help in
getting past an ambiguity in rfc1759.  While I don't want to bug
you needlessly, I am anxious to verify that our request is in the 
queue.  Many of the followers of this list have crushing deadlines
and are anxious to resolve the issue sooner rather than later.  

Did you get my message?
Are you the right person to ask for help?
If you are the right person, what do you suggest that we do?

Joel

followup on ambiguity in rfc1759 Joel Gyllenskog